brightspark

Nutrition Info

The Lumie forum is for general discussion of Seasonal Affective Disorder and all things light therapy. To join in you'll need to register.

We do not monitor this forum every day. If you want to reach Lumie please go to our contact us page.

Post reply Start new thread
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:17 22 December 2006

A lot of people come here and say that they feel they eat a healthy diet. I used to think that, too -- and then the depression hit. The problem is that the "nutrition" I was taught in school, and the ideas still commonly around now (i.e. that "low fat" is good, and that polyunsaturated oils are good, saturated fats are bad) is simply wrong. How on earth could doctors, teachers, and society at large be mistaken about this? For the same reasons that they are wrong about antidepressants being ideal treatments for mental illness. Pure ignorance. Before you write me off as a lunatic, there's loads of info out there to be had, from credible and respectable sources, if you just look for it. "The truth is out there," if you know how to find it.

It took me a long time searching before I did. I had the idea, or instinct, that there should be some kind of way to put my depression right. Something went wrong, and no one was going to tell me that it was going to stay wrong the rest of my life. Medications did not "fix" it. A lower carbohydrate, no-processed-sugar diet did not fix it. I was beginning to despair, when I finally found a naturopathic healer who has extensive medical and nutritional knowledge. She helped begin my re-education in nutrition. Much of what I know, and much of my healing, I owe to her. I've also done research on my own.

I don't claim to be an expert. Far from it. This is a field in which medical doctors should be much more knowledgeable themselves, because that's where the deep healing occurs, right at the root of many problems. Unfortunately, modern Western medicine tends to treat the symptoms rather than the cause, and it is obsessed with prescribing medications. We can't look to doctors as godlike, omnipotent figures who know how to put everything right. We at least owe it to ourselves to research what ails us and look for alternative solutions, especially when the doctors really are at a loss to help us.

I urge everyone who reads this, therefore, to take responsibility for your own health, to educate yourselves. That doesn't mean avoiding doctors, but admitting that doctors are capable of causing more harm than good if we blindly hand our well-being and very lives over to them.

That said, I'd like to share here what I've learned about nutrition in the past 8 months. It's only a beginning, but maybe it can offer some help and some hope to those who read it. This knowledge literally saved my life, because I was depressed and suicidal when I came across it.

Happy reading,
Linda.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:22 22 December 2006

Here is something I posted in another topic. I think it needs to be here for easy reference, at least so I can remember where to find it :)

Diet . . . Here's the lowdown, if you've led a fairly healthy lifestyle and haven't been on psychotropic or other biochemistry-altering medications.

Wholefoods diet. Lots of fresh veg and fruit, more than the five-a-day advocated here in the UK. Protein: meat, fish, poultry, eggs, cheese, nuts, etc. Healthy fats are necessary for the body's functioning too, even the villified saturated fats. Good fats include omega-3s, cold-pressed extra-virgin olive oil, butter, coconut and palm oil. This is VITAL. The modern Western diet is full of unhealthy fats that end up causing clogged arteries and all sorts of health problems.

Grains are OK in limited amounts, balanced out with protein and veg. They need to be whole grains like porridge, quinoa, or amaranth. Wheat flour products, even if they are whole wheat, are digested too quickly by the body. Many people who have blood sugar fluctuations that influence their moods end up being diagnosed as bipolar.

If what I'm saying about fats flies against everything you've been taught, that's what I thought at first too. Looking into this subject just revolutionised my world, how I eat, how I feel. A good article on this can be found at http://www.westonaprice.org/knowyourfats/skinny.html

You can try having some lentils too, in limited amounts. You might also try eliminating milk, though fermented dairy products (which don't have lactose in them) are more easily tolerated by most people -- yogurt, cheese, kefir, etc. If you have blood sugar issues, it is best to eliminate unfermented milk products due to the lactose, a kind of sugar, which they contain.

Things to definitely eliminate:

Sugar
Alcohol
Flour products
Polyunsaturated fats, apart from olive oil (they have too much of an imbalance of omega-6 fats)
hydrogenated vegetable oil
unfermented soy products such as Quorn and tofu
Processed, frozen and canned foods (the processing removes much of their nutritional value and often adds in harmful chemicals)
Potatoes (though yams are OK)

It is not only possible to eat this way, but you can still have a varied diet, feel great, and not miss what you thought were some of your favourite foods. My body is no longer used to sugar. I had a chocolate the other day and it made me feel sick and wreaked havoc with my digestive system. Our bodies are not designed to eat that stuff. The problem is that most everybody is used to eating it, so they don't notice what it's doing to their bodies.

What I eat is a rather strict version of the Paleolithic Diet. It's recommended for people with blood sugar problems, and for those who have been on psychotropic drugs, whose bodies need healing. You can find some info about this at

http://paleodiet.com/

A good multivitamin with lots of B-vitamins, colloidal mineral supplement, fish oil, magnesium and calcium, will also go a long way toward complementing this. Often the diet on its own isn't enough for people. It depends on your own personal needs; everyone's biochemistry is different.

You may think this is extreme, weird, whatever -- or not. I thought I'd share what I know for anyone who really wants to make changes in the way they eat.
Jeff
joined 13 Nov 2006
28 posts

send a pm

Posted by Jeff, 08:22 22 December 2006

I've thought repeatedly of starting a nutrition thread in here these past two days, but have been waiting for you to do it because I have been too lazy. I was going to mention it to you to see if that might provoke you to do it, ha!

Thanks for doing it anyway,

J
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:26 22 December 2006

Just Googling the Paleolithic Diet this morning, I found this link which sums the diet up very succinctly and efficiently.

http://altmed.creighton.edu/Paleodiet/Paleodiet.html

The Paleodiet

The basic idea of the Paleolithic Diet is to eat as similarly to our ancestors as possible. Our genetic makeup is designed for those foods, so to be in the best state of health we should eat accordingly.

By examining what humans ate more than 10,000 year ago we can create a dietary theory to follow today. This PaleoDiet is in stark contrast to the average American diet. The main differences are based on the intake of carbohydrates and fat as explained below.

First, let us examine carbohydrates:

The carbohydrate rich diets that we eat today would have been completely foreign to our ancestors. Think about where do most of our sugars and starches come from? The answer is grains. Foods like corn, rice, wheat, barley and oats are all types of grains. History indicates that the grain we eat today was domesticated from wild grasses. This occurred between 10,000 and 3,000 years ago in various parts of the world. Before this time here was no farming as we know it. People lived as hunter-gathers. In this lifestyle humans ate a lot of meat and whichever wild fruits and vegetable they could find. They did not have access to grain. And remember, our genetic makeup is 99.99% identical to those people.

Because humans did not have ready access to grain until recently (in a genetic time frame), our bodies are not well adapted to grain based diets. In the Paleodiet, carbohydrate intake is minimized to represent this idea. The carbohydrates that would have been available were nuts and berries, fruits and vegetables. There were no processed sugars or plates of pasta. To eat a paleodiet, these must be decreased significantly.

Next the fats:

Hunter-gathers did not have domesticated livestock. The meat they ate was from what they could catch. There were no livestock in pens, hogs in confinement lots or turkeys in huge barns. Studies show that animals that run free and are not commercially raised have a different composition of fat. “Free range” animals have higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids and lower levels of omega-6. This mean that less of the human fat intake would have been of the omega-6 type and more of the ω-3. The average American diet has about 10 times as much omega-6 fatty acids as omega-3. This ratio would have been closer to 3 to 1, or maybe even 1 to 1, in the prehistoric period.

Today, we can get more omega-3 fats by eating nuts, deep sea fish and free range meat. A lower ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 is a key component of this diet. It is recognized by many researchers as a more healthy balance of fat intake.

Protein:

Anthropological research shows that the Patheolithic people at more meat than the average American. Meat is a good source of protein and fat. Increasing the amount of protein intake is an important aspect of the Paleodiet.

Because of they way our bodies use protein, the actual source is not critical. But because fats are so often found mixed the protein, some thought must be given to selections. Free range meats, because of the more favorable fat profile are preferred over other sources.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:33 22 December 2006

Some things I've learned, and can add to this.

Fruit -- best avoided if you have blood sugar issues. Maybe some berries once in a while, which are lower in sugar, though it's worth bearing in mind that most fruit today has been cultivated to be sweeter than it would have been in the wild. You will get all the vitamins and minerals you need from a good vegetable intake, and some high-quality nutritional supplements like a multivitamin and colloidal minerals.

Grains -- up to individuals to experiment; though as the above article explains, our bodies don't really need them at all, and they can cause our bodies problems. I don't have any: no wheat products, no corn, rice, potatoes, legumes, none of it. I don't miss it. If I eat any now, it sits in my stomach like a rock.

This diet is fairly high in HEALTHY fats, again as the above article explains. You need to know what these are. Meat with fat attached to it is great, if you know that the animal was grass-fed, or fed on its natural diet (I still wait for the day when I can sample some chicken that was raised on its natural foraging food of insects). If the animal was grain-fed, you don't want to eat its fat because it's full of omega-6. Try explaining that to my parents, who love their yummy "good corn-fed" meat, LOL.

You won't gain weight on this diet if you keep grains to a minimum. You will instead shed the pounds at a slow and healthy rate. Eat what your body was originally programmed to eat and you will reap the rewards.

I'll post more info here as and when I have time, including sharing the nutritional and Paleo links I have.

With love,
Linda.
Jeff
joined 13 Nov 2006
28 posts

send a pm

Posted by Jeff, 08:37 22 December 2006

I agree with your list of things to eliminate, but I would add the following:

Pesticides
Hormones (i.e., growth hormones in animal products)
Tobacco
Most preservatives
Pretty much any chemicals in foods which do not naturally occur in food sources

For the most part, this is fairly easily accomplished by eating a diet that is 100% certified organic, excepting the tobacco of course, which just needs to not be used.

Tobacco is actually the last thing on my list of to-do's (which includes many more changes than what I've just listed) so far that I have yet to change. I don't use much, but a little goes a long way when you're talking about something as poisonous as tobacco.

I have also eliminated all animal products and wheat products, although I so far consider that a personal choice more than an absolute necessity.

Recommended reading: "The China Study". This book may provoke one to lean more towards viewing the aforementioned as a necessity.

I have come to realize that I need to view food much more a source of nutrients and energy than as a source of enjoyment. My two favorite foods are cheese and bread, and I resent ever having become hooked on them, which led to my malcontentment over discontinuing them. I have since discovered that both of them make me feel absolutley lousy almost immediately after consuming them.

EDIT: I want to add that cutting animal products requires a good knowledge of how the aquire the needed nutrients which may be abundant in these products, such as calcium, B12, and and esential fats. Almost any kind of diet change requires plenty of research and self education - I never would recommend making changes without this diligence.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:56 22 December 2006

I think we need to be careful about the vegetarian/vegan issue here, maybe best not to get into arguments. However, I think there's a lot of evidence that the human body needs animal products. That's what it evolved to have. Certainly, I would have to say a purely vegan diet is unhealthy. If you are a vegetarian, then the leader of my Withdrawal and Recovery list says you will not be able to heal much from the ravages of psychotropic drugs; you body needs animal proteins.

Why don't you join, and ask her about this?

If you react badly to cheese, then it certainly isn't necessary to eat cheese in order to be healthy. Bread isn't necessary either. If you eliminate grains from your diet, then you will probably find you do not crave carbs, be they breads or sugars. Doing Paleo is the only way I've been able to free myself of sugar cravings that plagued me my entire life.

Must dash, happy to chat later if you like :)
Linda.
Jeff
joined 13 Nov 2006
28 posts

send a pm

Posted by Jeff, 09:24 22 December 2006

I'm still not entirely decided about meat myself. I would probably eat fish with some regularity, except I have read so much about the bioaccumulation of mercury in fish. Recently, I learned more about which fish have more mercury and are of particular concern, and which have less. However, that has so far been on the back burner for me, and the fish that are supposedly better, to my knowledge, are too expensive for me to eat.

I already joined that Yahoo group, but I will not start posting or reading there until I have reviewed the usual approximatley 10 emails which I recieved upon admittance to the group.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 10:04 22 December 2006

What you say about fish sounds sensible to me. If you're willing to have fish oil then most all of your omega-3 can come from that. There are recommended brands that are fairly pure from toxins.

It's also sensible, as you say, to read the files you've been sent closely. I didn't and I'm paying the price. When I joined that group I was mad keen to stop taking my medication, so I did a flimsy week-long taper and that was that. I should have read about all the problems that can occur if you do that but I brushed it off. I'm told that most people who join don't read the files, so you're giving yourself a really good start I think.

Right, I'll see about getting some links posted here.

Linda :)
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 10:22 22 December 2006

samleona
joined 6 Apr 2006
18 posts

send a pm

Posted by samleona, 12:38 22 December 2006

Hi Linda

Thanks for this information. I don't post very often, but I am interested in trying this form of eating to see if it does work, although I'm concerned it will be horrendously difficult to get used to!
I've just about given up on my doctor today as all they are interested in is prescribing AD's which I do not want, so I'm going to have to try and help myself.
It sounds similar to nutritional advice given for SAD by natropath & nutritionist Michael Van Straten on his website.
I think I will do some research and give it a go once christmas is out of the way. I'll let you know how I get on.

Thanks for giving me some hope!
Sam
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 13:22 22 December 2006

Jeff and Sam, I will look at the suggestions for reading you've given here. I always welcome the chance to learn more about these things, so thanks.

You may find that going Paleo to whatever degree suits you, still isn't enough. (Though it may well be all you need.) If this is the case, then having some nutritional supplements is probably necessary. It is certainly necessary if you are, or have in the past been, on psychotropic drugs.

When I went Paleo, I found at first that I was hungry in the mornings, like I used to be, for about 3 days (the time it takes sugar to clear the system). But that I got major digestive problems from the increase in fats. I think I was going down the route my mother went; she ended up having her gall bladder removed. (I already was getting the odd bout of acute irritable bowel syndrome.) I was told to try taking some digestive enzymes. They helped a lot, and I found I only needed them for a couple of weeks.

I started losing my appetite in the morning, to the point where I was nauseous at the thought of breakfast -- though I always ate it because I knew I needed it. I was told this is what typically happens to people who are insulin resistant -- initially their bodies crave a top-up of the carbs they are addicted to, so they are hungry in the morning. When the simple carbs are cut out, then your body chemistry changes and the insulin resistance causes you not to want to eat in the morning. I don't know the mechanics of this myself, it's just something I've accepted and moved on from. I find it helps if I know what's happening to me.

Now, after 8 months, I'm not feeling any ill effects from not having the foods I cut out. I often feel worse if I do have them. I never feel sluggish and sleepy after eating, like I used to when I had a meal with pasta or lots of bread. My body tells me when it's full, and I stop eating. If I don't have enough fat or veg with a meal, I feel oddly empty. I don't even get headaches anymore -- not a single one! What's more, I no longer have to worry about developing diabetes or heart disease, digestive problems, gaining weight, spending money on junk food that I crave. I can't say it's always easy, because I was a massive sugar addict, but the benefits are just so good.

I also juice vegetables once or twice a day, which I've also found to be a huge benefit, but that's an issue for another day.

I hope you guys get the joy from this that I have. It's fun to do something new and to experiment. Don't expect a quick fix, but you should start to feel better almost from the beginning. Over time the benefits accumulate as the body heals.

Best wishes,
Linda.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 10:11 26 January 2007

Here is an extract from a book by one of orthomolecular nutrition's most respected and longest-standing practitioners, Abrham Hoffer. He is mainly known for his success in treating schizophrenia with megavitamin therapy (specifically B3 and C).

It is interesting to compare Hoffer's take on mental illness with Breggin's (see the Antidepressant Info topic). Hoffer uses the language of the psychiatrist and talks of neuroses and diseases. In treating a patient he would first and foremost look at the patient's diet. He is not a supporter of "talk therapy." Breggin, however, believes talk therapy to be of ciritcal value, especially when the alternative is psychiatric drugs. However he seems unaware of the role nutrition plays in mental illness.

If only the twain shall meet, LOL. Hoffer still has much knowledge to offer, and it is tragic that the mainstream does not pay more attention to his research. This extract explains some of his ideas about nutrition, particularly how the modern Western diet can cause mental and physical illness.

from Putting it All Toegther: The New Orthomolecular Nutrition, by Abram Hoffer M.D. and Morton Walker D.P.M.

Some years ago a woman was admitted to City Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, with a diagnosis of self-induced skin gouges, a supposed psychiatric problem. Her immediate history included a broken love affair – which was generally considered the reason why this woman, a nurse, was tearing at her own skin. Invariably I include a nutritional history as part of any patient’s entry under my care, and I learned that she had suffered severe malnutrition long ago as a prisoner of a concentration camp in Europe. Now she had a resultant vitamin dependency . Additionally, she was eating a highly processed carbohydrate diet routinely. This was a combination debilitating to her mental health.

This nurse was gouging out portions of herself because of a severe state of anxiety-depression. I treated her psychiatric problem with orthomolecular nutrition (which consisted primarily of a nonrefined carbohydrate diet and vitamins) and she became well enough to be discharged from the hospital within two weeks. Her skin damage had ceased altogether. Any other orthodox medical treatment would have placed her under long-term, detailed psychotherapy – perhaps once a week for the next five years. It could not possibly have helped. Her malnutrition of thirty years before had finally caught up with her and caused mental illness – which was relieved through nutrition according to the principles of orthomolecular therapy.

The Consequences of Consuming a Junk Diet

Overconsumption of refined food causes the saccharine disease. Organ changes from the saccharine disease result in diabetes, peptic ulcer, constipation (and its effects such as varicose veins, hemorrhoids and cancer of the bowel) and other debilitations. Consequently, an orthomolecular therapist will direct primary attention toward changing the patient’s diet.

Associated with the saccharine disease, and especially with mental and emotional problems resulting from it, is the condition known as relative hypoglycemia. In reality, relative hypoglycemia is not a clinical entity in itself, being a term used to denote a laboratory test result in which a person’s blood sugar level decreases more than 20mg per 100ml after being given a “challenge dose” of 100g of glucose, constituting a six-hour sugar tolerance test. One can only guess at the proportion of our population who have relative hypoglycemia, but assuredly it is large – perhaps close to a majority.

Of 500 alcoholics that my colleagues and I have tested, almost all suffered a decrease of 20mg or more in blood sugar. About 10% of any adult population consumes excessive quntities of alcohol, and it is likely this group suffers from the saccharine disease. And as two-thirds of all neurotics and people with depression have the condition, we may assume that at least 35 to 50% of our entire population is victimised by its mental and physical manifestations. It is a result of the average North American ingesting a junk diet.

A Junk Diet Is:

A junk diet supplies poor quality eating – foods which contain sugar, white flour or polished rice, alcohol and items processed by manufacturers from whole foods. People are allergic to certain foods, and consumption of them can result in disease.

In effect, a junk diet is a disease, especially resulting in the so-called degenerative diseases of civilisation such as heart problems, and forms of cancer, arthritis and diabetes. Junk foods are artifacts derived from living organisms, either plant or animal. The major plant material which comprises living natural food is the seed of wheat, corn and rice. Seeds are the plant’s future progeny. When a wheat kernel is formed, it contains the amount of protein, carbohydrate, fat, vitamins and minerals necessary to launch a new plant. These components must also be present in adequate amounts in the human diet to support a person’s nutrition. In processed foods such components are not present. On the other hand, seeds and nuts, which are capable of growing new plants, are nutritious packets of food for us.

The flesh and organs of animals are even closer in composition to our bodies. When they are consumed they provide most of our requirements, provided we do not eat damaged goods of devitalised quality altered during the journey from the animal to our plates.

The components of food in nature’s packets are combined in a very intricate relationship. Protein, fat and carbohydrate interlaced with vitamins and minerals must be present. When natural food is consumed, all its components are provided at the same time. The elemental nutrients such as the amino acids, simple sugars and other items, will be delivered via the circulated blood to all the cells together. All the essential amino acids must be present about the same time. It does not help the cell to be supplied half the essential amino acids and then to receive the other half twelve hours later. If all the components are not present simultaneously, the cell functions poorly.

People are surprised when they discover that our present diets are generally inferior to the diets of our ancestors. They point to the tremendous advances in the science of nutrition and to our present food technology. It is hard for them to believe that modern foods, which taste so palatable, are so attractively packaged, and are so easy to warm up in a twentieth-century kitchen, can be as harmful as they are. Not uncommonly, people who are burying themselves with their teeth look upon those who are disturbed by our modern diets as food faddists or freaks.

Patients who have recovered from disease by eliminating sugar from their diet sometimes force a test of their eating programmes upon themselves. Very often they will expose themselves to several relapses by reverting to the diet that originally made them ill. They then return to orthomolecular physicians for care, while knowing full well what has gone wrong. Although they could overcome recurrence of their symptoms by halting their intake of processed and high-sugar foods, they return for treatment because they need the doctor’s reasurance and confirmation that their eating is valid, to offset the negative opinions of ignorant consumers of highly refined foods.

The Results of Eating Junk Food

Artifact or “junk” foods include such items as white bread, commercial french-fried potatoes, non-dairy creams made of chemicals and all the foods to which sugar has been added. Pies, pastry, cakes, chocolate, candy, most desserts, jello and many canned goods such as soups, contain added sugar.

Most children like sweets, and often sugared foods form a staple of their diet. When fed a diet free of processed junk, these children may feel deprived. However, not uncommonly after six months the sugar addiction will be lost, and they can adapt to the various healthier foods substituted. If sugar addiction actually manifests itself as allergy, junk food will produce disease symptoms which become uncomfortable. Any tissue or organ in the body may react.

Allergy to sugar and other components of processed food may manifest itself in the skin in the form of hives, rashes, itch, swelling, redness, decreaed ability to move because of skin rubbing and tautness, and pain. The urinary bladded may shrink and cause bed wetting. The central nervous system can react, causing a variety of unpleasant symptoms such as tension, anxiety, depression, hallucinations, thought disorder and changes in behaviour. The neuroses or psychoneuroses are psychiatric diseases that mainly alter mood. Psychosomatic conditions also fall into this category.

Malnutrition resulting from excessive comsumption of processed food in the form of refined carbohydrates is also the major cause of a braod group of neuroses and physical illnesses. Until recently these were looked upon as unrelated diseases with no known etiology, but now the root cause, nutritive deficiency, has become apparent. It may help many people who suffer from these diseases to embrace principles of proper eating. They will become aware immediately, from the reduction of their symptoms, of the reasons why they have been ill.

The mass indictment of refined carbohydrates as the cause of many of the ills of Westernised countries today was advanced by Surgeon-Captain T.L. Cleave, formerly director of medical research of the Institute of Naval Medicine, Great Britain. In 1956, he designated “the saccharine disease” as the master disease, incorporating diabetes, coronary disease, obesity, peptic ulcer, constipation, hemorrhoids, varicose veins; Escherichia coli infections such as appendicitis, cholecystitis, pyelitis and diverticulitis; renal calculus, many skin conditions and dental caries.

The master disorder which is the saccharine disease produces a variety of physical and mental manifestations that derive from the excessive consumption of refined or processed carbohydrates. Primarily, these are sugar and white flour. Highly processed products of this type cause specific physical anf psychiatric changes sometimes labeled psychosomatic and sometimes considered idiopathic. To distinguish them, however, and separate them from “thinking” diseases that arise from an influence of the mind or “unknown” diseases that come from no apparent extrinsic cause, the doctor merely needs to perform a six-hour glucose tolerance test on his patient.

Psychological Manifestations of the Saccharine Disease

I have identified relative hypoglycemia (functional insulinism) as a psychological component of the saccharine disease. The basic problems arise from the excessive consumption of refined carbohydrates, chiefly sugar and white flour. In 1924, about one year after insulin came into general use for the treatment of diabetes, Seale Harris, M.D., Professor of Medicine at the University of Alabama, noted that many non-diabetics experienced some symptoms of insulin overdosage, insulin shock. He suggested that in some people “hyperinsulinism” occurred: that is, the pancreas overreacted with secretion of too much insulin. Dr. Harris developed the six-hour glucose tolerance test to determine its presence.

However, today relative hypoglycemia is uniformly rejected by the majority of physicians as a valid entity or even as the end result of a diagnostic laboratory test. It remains one of the diseases not taught in medical schools. Not uncommonly, a 50-to-75 year gap will occur between medical discovery and application of its knowledge. For example, it took 50 years before the Royal Navy adopted Sir James Lind’s discovery that citrus fruits would cure and prevent scurvy. Nevertheless, more than 90 years have passed since Dr. Harris developed his glucose tolerance test and there still remains a reluctance to accept it on the part of medical traditionalists. Reading about relative hypoglycemia here, you now know that low blood sugar is responsible for a great deal of mental illness. When the sugar content of blood goes too low all the tissues of the body have alternative sources of energy except the brain. Brain tissue depends primarily upon glucose for its energy.

A consistent association prevails between neuroses and relative hypoglycemia. Symptoms may include depression, insomnia, anxiety, irritability, crying spells, phobias, lack of concentration and confusion. Accompanying these neurotic symptoms may be physical ones: fatigue, sweating, rapid heartbeat, diminished appetite and chronic indigestion. Other main neurotic symptoms may be headache, dizziness, tremor, muscle pain and backache. Hypoglycemic people do have the typical neurotic symptoms. Possibly one-third of people visiting their physicians for various symptoms suffer from this condition. It is one of the most common causes of neuropsychiatric illness, and it occurs because of the poor dietary habits of Western civilisation.

************

Criteria of Mental Health

Disappointment and annoyance are emotions I feel at the number of psychiatrists who remain content to keep their schizophrenic patients heavily and permanently tranquilised. Those patients are perfect consumers of services, support and every other community resource, but never again are they able to be productive citizens of society. They are being given cruel, ignorant and inhumane treatment. Keeping them tranquilised holds them in a state of abnormality not reconcilable with the precepts of morality – the science of the good and the nature of the right.

By my criteria, a patient is well or recovered from mental disease as soon as he is free of all signs and symptoms. He returns, or is able to return, to his former occupation or, if he had never worked before, now acquires a useful occupation. He gets on well with his family and with the community.

The basic treatment for mental disease in orthomolecular medicine is the overcoming of the effects of poor nutrition with corrective nutritional therapy. Yet a measure of ignorance of many medical critics of this care is that they hardly ever take nutritional histories of their patients. The most enthusiastic exponents of treatment of mental disease with nutrition are physicians who have themselves suffered with psychological manifestations of the saccharine disease. There is nothing as convincing as a personal cure, especially when every other treatment has been ineffective.

An example of what I mean is the result of my treatment of four general physicians who became severely psychotic before entering the study of medicine or who became ill after being in practice. They are now normal and practising successfully. The other two medical students recovered from mental ills under my care and are now completing their medical training. Medical study, calling for stringent concentration as it does, points up these recoveries as remarkable. I am unaware of other physicians able to recover from psychosis and practise medicine after being treated with standard tranquiliser therapy.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:35 4 February 2007

Links

http://www.mercola.com/article/sugar/dangers_of_sugar.htm">http://www.thepaleodiet.com/

http://www.beyondveg.com/

"76 Ways Sugar Can Ruin Your Health"
http://www.mercola.com/article/sugar/dangers_of_sugar.htm


Books

The Paleo Diet: Lose Weight and Get Healthy by Eating the Food You Were Designed to Eat, by Loren Cordain

Nourishing Traditions: The Cookbook that Challenges Politically Correct Nutrition and the Diet Dictocrats, by Sally Fallon and Mary Enig

Sugar Blues by William Dufty
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:08 9 February 2007

The International Network of Cholesterol Sceptics
http://www.thincs.org/index.htm

Questioning conventional wisdom about cholestrol and statins -- article from the Daily Mail
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/healthmain.html?in_article_id=430682&in_page_id=1774&in_page_id=1774&expand=true#StartComments


Both of these links assert that there is no connection bewteen high cholesterol and heart disease, or between saturated fat and high cholesterol, or saturated fat and heart disease. Sounds incredible? Have a look.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:25 9 February 2007

From Nourishing Traditions by Sally Fallon:

Twentieth-century men and women, faced with a dazzling array of modern food products, are naturally tempted by their convenience and glitz. They would prefer not to worry about how their foods are processed or what they contain; they would prefer not to spend time in food preparation the way their ancestors did. But the inevitable consequence of this insouciance is the host of debilitating diseases now endemic in our society.

With traditions forgotten, the tool that allows modern men and women to regain their health and vitality is knowledge -- knowledge of the fruits of honest scientific inquiry as well as renewed familiarity with culinary customs of times past. The cook, the food provider and parents of young children can no longer afford to be misled by what passes for nutritional wisdom in the popular press, especially as so much orthodox advice -- magnified, simplified and twisted by publicity for processed foods -- is partially or totally wrong. We urge you to keep abreast of research conducted by independent researchers and holistic doctors, especially as it sheds light on the nourishing traditions of our ancestors.

Then call on your reserves of ingenuity and creativity to translate that knowledge into delicious meals in whatever culinary tradition may appeal to you and your family. We must not lose sight of the fact that the fundamental requirement of the food we eat is that we like it. The healthiest food in the world does us no good if we must gag it down because it tastes bad.

Our food should satisfy our four basic tastes -- salt, sour, bitter and sweet. These tastes are meant to guide us to the foods that we need, but they are easily suborned by our ignorance or lack of will. Satisfy the salt taste with natural sea salt or traditional meat broths, which also provide magnesium and vital trace minerals, instead of products laced with MSG or drenched in commercial salt; please the sour taste bud with old-fashioned fermented foods that provide the enzymatic by-products of the culturing process, rather than with pasteurized condiments and alcohol; gratify the bitter taste bud with dark green vegetables and bitter herbs that are valued in every traditional society, so rich in vitamins and minerals, instead of coffee and tea; and delight the sweet tooth with fruits at their peak of ripeness and with natural sweeteners high in nutrients, rather than refined sugar products.

The challenge to every individual is to determine the diet that is right for them and to implement that diet in a way that does not divorce them from the company of fellow human beings at mealtimes. Each person's ideal diet is usually discovered through a combination of study, observation and intuition, a process designed to replace that mysterious infallible instinct that guided primitive people to the foods they needed to keep them healthy and strong.

To make us healthy, our food must taste good; it must be digestible, and it must be eaten in peace. Even whole foods, properly prepared according to traditional methods, do us no good if we eat them with a grudge; they will not confer health on the person who does not forgive. It is the loving heart who will find guidelines for providing an abundance of all the nutrients we need to live healthy, happy and productive lives.
Jeff
joined 13 Nov 2006
28 posts

send a pm

Posted by Jeff, 08:31 9 February 2007

Hi Linda,

I read your Jan 26th post from Abrham Hoffer's writing when you first posted it...


I just realized that that was only about 10 days ago, which is really strange, because that seems like 2 months ago to me... I have been so busy lately with school and miscellaneous life things, that time is flying.

Anyway, I thought Hoffer's ideas there were very interesting and the mention of the saccharide disease really "rang true" for me. I had slightly below normal results on the second (2 hour) blood draw on my 2 hour glucose tolerance test, and his suggestions, causes, and consequences of these kind of results correlated perfectly with my own personal experience throughout my life.

I was wondering where you got that book excerpt? It seems that you have posted a number of book excerpts here, which is confusing to me, because I very rarely ever find a book excerpt, or a whole book for that matter, posted online in html (regular text) format, to facilitate copy/pasting. Where do you find these book excerpts? Or did you type that all out? It also seems I may have asked you this question before, but I do not recall.
Jeff
joined 13 Nov 2006
28 posts

send a pm

Posted by Jeff, 08:40 9 February 2007

!!! You just came up with another book excerpt even as I was writing that question...

I can't help but wonder if you have a better or different method of searching for these things? I have no problem finding plenty of articles, technical and otherwise, on the subjects that I am researching, but I am yet to find book excepts anywhere.

Book excerpts can be found at amazon.com for example for certain books, but that is not a viable method of researcvhing anything and even there, they are not in a copy/pastable format.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 09:45 9 February 2007

My source is Catherine Creel. Well, she's often the start. Then I branch out on tangents of my own. Often I'll look up a link she gives me, find names, info there, links to other sites, and off I go.

I type these excepts out myself. I don't mind, if my cortisol can cope with it. It gives me something worthwhile to do. It's hard sitting around the house at this time of year, hoping/waiting for a job. I've done my best to be a stay-at-home mum but it's had a devastating effect on my mental health.

At any rate, most of the books I've recommended can be found at Amazon.co.uk or Amazon.com. What I've found is the more information I absorb, the more balanced I feel about it all. The authors of these books have their own agendas and they are skewed toward this. Peter Breggin is outstanding in his stance against psychotropic drugs, several other doctors are, but they do not marry any nutritional awareness with this, and end up offering little comofort to people whose depressions are partly or mostly caused by nutritional problems. Abram Hoffer is outstanding in his awareness of how vitamins can treat illnesses, but he is arrogant/ignorant enough to say in his own book that he thinks talk therapy should be completely unnecessary. Part of his original treatment for the girl whose schizophrenia turned out to be caused by multiple food allergies, was to offer her ECT, which he coldly decided did not help her. (My god, how would anybody truly be helped by having their bodies and brains fried?) And Sally Fallon is a big advocate of whole grains. I originally changed my own diet by cutting out sugar and white flour, which is about as far as she goes, but it didn't help much. I needed the full Paleo diet to be able to start healing.

However, taken all together, there's a lot of knowledge there. I'd also recommend Linus Pauling's How to Live Longer and Feel Better. It's a little out of date, and again I don't think his dietary advice is radical enough to help people who are already ill, but for info about vitamin C and its hundreds of benefits, it is a book second to none. There's also info about other vitamins. He was a remarkable man.

I know there's software you can get that will scan a page from a book and put the text in a word processor. Our scanners are covered in dust upstairs though, and my husband (who is the computer expert) is at work every day. So I type. I enjoy sharing this info. If only it had been available to me before the drugs.

Linda :)
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 20:47 10 February 2007

Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 13:50 15 February 2007

Sugar rush: the sweetening of the British palate

http://www.guardian.co.uk/food/Story/0,,2013348,00.html
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 11:20 16 February 2007

An overview of the researches of Weston A. Price, who travelled around the world at the beginning of the 20th century and studied the diets of isolated "primitive" people. How their diets were different from the modern Western diet, and why the way we eat now is making us -- as well as successive generations who inherit nutritional deficiencies from undernourished mothers -- more and more ill.

http://www.westonaprice.org/tour/index.html
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 19:20 24 March 2007

Rise in Mental Illness Linked to Unhealthy Diets, Say Studies

· Patients benefit by cutting intake of junk food
· NHS warned of rise in £100bn bill

Felicity Lawrence
Monday January 16, 2006
The Guardian

Changes in diet over the past 50 years appear to be an important factor behind a significant rise in mental ill health in the UK, say two reports published today.
The Mental Health Foundation says scientific studies have clearly linked attention deficit disorder, depression, Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia to junk food and the absence of essential fats, vitamins and minerals in industrialised diets.

A further report, Changing Diets, Changing Minds, is also published today by Sustain, the organisation that campaigns for better food. It warns that the NHS bill for mental illness, at almost £100bn a year, will continue to rise unless the government focuses on diet and the brain in its food, farming, education and environment policies.

"Food can have an immediate and lasting effect on mental health and behaviour because of the way it affects the structure and function of the brain," Sustain's report says. Its chairman, Tim Lang, said: "Mental health has been completely neglected by those working on food policy. If we don't address it and change the way we farm and fish, we may lose the means to prevent much diet-related ill health."

Both reports, which have been produced collaboratively, outline the growing scientific evidence linking poor diet to problems of behaviour and mood. Rates of depression have been shown to be higher in countries with low intakes of fish, for example. Lack of folic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, selenium and the amino acid tryptophan are thought to play an important role in the illness. Deficiencies of essential fats and antioxidant vitamins are also thought to be a contributory factor in schizophrenia.

A pioneering nutrition and mental health programme, thought to be the only one of its kind in Britain, was carried out at Rotherham, South Yorkshire. According to Caroline Stokes, its research nutritionist, the mental health patients she saw generally had the poorest diets she had ever come across. "They are eating lots of convenience foods, snacks, takeaways, chocolate bars, crisps. It's very common for clients to be drinking a litre or two of cola a day. They get lots of sugar but a lot of them are eating only one portion of fruit or vegetable a day, if that."

The therapy includes omega-3 fatty acids and multivitamins, with advice on cutting out junk food and replacing it with oily fish, leafy vegetables for folic acid, Brazil nuts for selenium, and food providing tryptophan.

Some patients who resist treatment with drugs accept nutritional therapy and most have reported an improvement in mood and energy. Ms Stokes said: "Within the first month there's been a significant reduction in depression. We've had letters from psychiatrists saying they can see a huge difference."

One sufferer who benefited from a dietary change was James McLean, who was at university when first diagnosed with bipolar disorder (manic depression). After he had been sectioned repeatedly, his father read about the role of nutrition in mental health. The pair went privately to the Brain Bio Centre, in London, where Mr McLean's nutrient levels were checked; he was allergic to gluten and yeast and was given supplements, including vitamin B and essential fatty acids.

"I'd been eating lots of intense carbohydrate foods ... because they were cheap, and very little fruit or vegetables," Mr McLean said. Now, he excludes wheat from his diet too. He added: "I have more energy and confidence, I sleep better, and I came off the anti-psychotic drugs, although I still take mood stabilising ones."

Andrew McCulloch, chief executive of the Mental Health Foundation, acknowledged that mental illness results from a complex interplay of biological, social, psychological and environmental factors, but thought diet should be an everyday component of mental health care. "It costs £1,000 a week to keep someone in a psychiatric hospital. How much does good food cost? We need mentally healthy school meals, and mentally healthy hospital foods," he said.

Best choices and worst:

Good for the brain:

Vegetables, especially leafy
Seeds and nuts
Fruit
Whole grains
Wheatgerm
Organic eggs
Organic farmed or wild fish, especially fatty fish

Bad for the brain:

Deep fried junk foods
Refined processed foods
Pesticides
Alcohol
Sugar
Tea and coffee
Some additives
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 11:32 1 April 2007

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, February 23, 2007


NO DEATHS FROM VITAMINS: Poison Control Statistics Prove Supplements’
Safety
(OMNS Feb 23, 2007) There was not even one death caused by vitamins in
2005, according to the most recent statistics available from the US National
Poisoning and Exposure Database. The 129-page annual report of the American
Association of Poison Control Centers published in the journal Clinical
Toxicology (1) shows zero deaths from multiple vitamins; zero deaths from
any of the B vitamins; zero deaths from vitamins A, C, D, or E; and zero
deaths from any other vitamin.

Over half of the U.S. population takes daily vitamin supplements. Even
if each of those people took only one single tablet per day, that makes
145,000,000 individual doses per day, for a total of over 53 billion doses
annually. Since many persons take additional vitamins, the numbers are
considerably higher, and the safety of vitamins all the more remarkable.

References:

1. Lai MW, Klein-Schwartz W, Rodgers GC et al. 2005 Annual Report of
the American Association of Poison Control Centers' national poisoning and
exposure database. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006; 44(6-7): 803-932. Free
download from
http://www.aapcc.org/Annual%20Reports/05report/2005%20Publsihed.pdf .
Vitamins statistics are found in Table 22, towards the end of the report.

For further reading:

Download any Annual Report of the American Association of Poison
Control Centers from 1983-2005 free of charge at:
http://www.aapcc.org/annual.htm The "Vitamin" category is usually at the
very end of the report.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 12:56 1 April 2007

Here is a good article that gives info about how the veg we eat today has fewer vitamins than the same veg a generation ago, and why it is beneficial to take vitamin supplements:

http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2001/mar2001_report_vegetables.html
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 13:21 1 April 2007

Compare the above "no deaths from vitamins" story to this one:

Death By Medicine
A definitive review and close reading of medical peer-review journals, and government health statistics shows that American medicine frequently causes more harm than good.

http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/features/death_by_medicine.html
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 13:39 1 April 2007

More info on the mineral depletion of soil. Includes some info about veg farmed in the UK. An in-depth explanation of what happened, how it affects people, and what can be done about the problem.

http://www.trccorp.com/faq_root_disease

Meat and Dairy: Where Have the Minerals Gone?
http://www.foodcomm.org.uk/PDF%20files/meat_dairy2.pdf
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 12:47 10 April 2007

The Big Vitamin Scare: American Medical Association Claims Vitamins May Kill You

NewsTarget.com, Feb. 28, 2007

The latest round in conventional medicine's ongoing attempts to discredit (and ultimately outlaw) nutritional supplements is found in a highly questionable study published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which claims that vitamins actually increase the risk of death.

The study claims to have analyzed a collection of previous studies on Vitamin A, beta carotene, Vitamin C, Vitamin E and selenium, concluding that most of the nutrients are actually dangerous to human health. Of course, this is research from conventional medicine – an industry that promotes patented chemicals as perfectly safe, even though FDA-approved pharmaceuticals are killing 100,000 Americans each year. (Imagine the uproar if vitamins killed even a fraction of that number…)

To avoid getting hoodwinked by questionable research on "vitamins," you have to strongly consider the financial interests of the source of this research. JAMA accepts millions of dollars in advertising from drug companies each year, and its pages are absolutely packed with drug ads. The American Medical Association, for its part, has long worked to discredit alternative medicine and has even been found guilty by U.S. federal courts of engaging in a conspiracy to destroy chiropractic medicine. The AMA, which is largely considered a joke by anyone familiar with natural health, is hardly a credible source for publishing scientific findings on nutrition. To protect the multi-billion dollar drug industry, the AMA would say practically anything, I believe.


How to fake a vitamin study

Faking a vitamin study to show supplements as harmful is extremely easy to pull off, by the way. All you have to do is use synthetic forms of the vitamins and avoid using natural, food-sourced vitamins. These synthetic vitamins – which are really just industrial chemicals – may be called "Vitamin E" or "Vitamin A" or even "Vitamin C" but they have no functional resemblance to the real vitamins that occur in nature. Every single study over the past two decades that has sought to discredit Vitamin E, for example, focused on using synthetic Vitamin E in order to show harm. It is curious that no researcher from the world of conventional medicine will ever test the natural, full-spectrum vitamins, nutrients and phytochemicals that appear in nature. You know why? Because they would discover a universe of natural medicine that makes patented prescription drugs obsolete.

A second way to fake a vitamin meta-data study is to simply cherry-pick the results you want to include in your meta-data analysis. This is a routine trick used by dishonest researchers who have an agenda of discrediting nutritional supplements. To pull this one off, they simply eliminate all previous studies that showed positive results for vitamins, and include only previous studies that showed negative results. Then they run a statistical analysis on all the studies they hand-picked and declare – surprise! – those vitamins are dangerous! Many of the studies on vitamin E, by the way, were conducted on dying heart patients who were only expected to live two weeks, regardless of what they took.

A third way to distort the science is to confuse people with statistical obfuscation. The reporting on this particular study, for example, confuses absolute risk with relative risk. Vitamin A, according to the reports on this study, increased mortality risk by 16 percent. But that is a relative risk number, meaning that if 1 person out of 100 normally died, then 1.16 people out of 100 would die when taking these synthetic Vitamin A supplements. In other words, it might not even be one additional person out of 100, or even out of 1000.

And yet, it is curious that when conventional medical researchers report the results of mortality risks for their prescription drugs, they always use absolute risk. They say things like, "Well, this drug only increased the risk by one percent." But what they are not saying is that it may be a 200% relative increase in mortality risk, depending on the baseline absolute mortality numbers. So if only 0.5 people out of 100 normally died from heart disease during a particular study, but 1.5 people died when taking a drug during that study, the relative risk increase is 200%. But the medical journals and the mainstream media will report is at a "one percent increase."

You see how the game is played? Here's the con:

• All statistics on the dangers of prescription drugs are reported as absolute risk to make the numbers seem smaller (and make drugs seem safe).

• All statistics on the dangers of synthetic vitamins are reported as relative risk to make the numbers seem larger (and vitamins seem dangerous).

And this is how conventional medicine lies with statistics. It's only one of the many tricks used to disinform the American public about the dangers of pharmaceuticals or the benefits of nutrition.

This research published in JAMA does remind us of one important point, however: synthetic chemicals are harmful to human health. If you take cheap "vitamins" made of these synthetic chemicals, you are doing yourself more harm than good. These cheap vitamin manufacturers, by the way, are usually owned by pharmaceutical firms. I would personally never take vitamins purchased at common retailers such as Wal-Mart or Walgreens. I only recommend and consume vitamins from high-end nutritional supplement companies.


Blurring the line to scare consumers

But conventional medicine researchers try to blur the line between "junk vitamins" and "quality vitamins" by classifying all nutritional supplements as "vitamins," regardless of what they're really made from. By discrediting a few synthetic chemicals, they can effectively dissuade the masses from taking ANY vitamins, including the good ones. And that is, of course, their goal: to use FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) to scare consumers away from nutritional supplements so that patients will flock to the patented, synthetic chemicals that earn drug companies billions of dollars in profits. Drugs make money for Big Pharma, and vitamins compete with drug sales. Once you understand the economics and the motives of the parties involved here, the junk science con becomes quite obvious: Pushers of pharmaceuticals will always use dirty tricks to discredit nutritional supplements because it is in their financial interests to do so.

My own financial interests, by the way, are squeaky clean. I sell no supplements, I earn no money from supplement companies, and in fact I am not even paid by NewsTarget for my work on these articles. In terms of potential conflicts of interest, I have far more credibility than the AMA, a shady organization that remains mired in blatant conflicts of interest and a frightening agenda of pushing drugs, surgery and radiation onto as many Americans as possible.

Now, here's a common sense way to quickly realize the JAMA research is complete nonsense. Round up 100 people who are taking multiple pharmaceuticals, and compare their health to 100 people who are taking vitamins and nutritional supplements. Guess who's healthier? The supplement crowd will be healthier every time. It's the obvious question: If vitamins are so dangerous, where are all the dead vitamin takers? And if pharmaceuticals are so safe, where are all the super-healthy prescription drug patients? They are nowhere to be found.

The healthiest people, by far, are those who take supplements, who engage in regular exercise, and who avoid taking prescription drugs.


Why conventional medical researchers remain nutritionally illiterate

Western medicine still doesn't "get" nutrition. They think all health effects are achieved by single, isolated chemical constituents. But nutrition doesn't work that way. In nature, for example, Vitamin C is not a single chemical, but rather a symphony of complementary phytonutrients that work in concert. Conventional medical researchers almost never test plant medicine using full-spectrum nutrients. Why? Because they don't understand the concept of nutritional synergy.

The bottom line? Only fools believe research about nutrition that comes from the American Medical Association or its journal. Conventional medical researchers declaring that vitamins are worthless is about as credible as Bush Administration climatologists claiming there's no such thing as global warming.

With the publication of this research, the distortion of health reality is now complete. According to the Americal Medical Association, vitamins will kill you but pharmaceuticals will make you healthy.

Someone help me stop laughing before I blow out a lung and require surgery.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 18:43 10 April 2007

Conventional medicine vs. naturopathy: How to fix a leaky roof

NewsTarget.com, April 10, 2007

People often ask me about the difference in philosophy between conventional medicine and naturopathic medicine. While the differences are numerous, some of the more fundamental ones can easily be explained. Imagine your body is a house, and the health of your body is the maintenance of that house. If you don't do regular maintenance on this house, the roof of your house begins to leak and you might notice water dripping into your home every time it rains. The water is a symptom of an underlying problem -- a roof with poor maintenance.

The difference between conventional medicine and naturopathic medicine can be described in the way that health practitioners would perceive this problem and attempt to resolve it. Conventional medicine would look at the water dripping out of the roof and find a way to measure it. So they would have a number, which might be 60 drips per hour, and they might say anything above that (such as 70 drips per hour or 100 drips per hour) is a disease, and they would name that disease something like, "Roofoporosis Disease."

They would identify the symptom itself -- the water -- as being the disease, and they would try to figure out which chemical would take care of it. In this case they might prescribe water absorbing crystals that you would spread around the house to absorb this excess water, completely ignoring the integrity of the roof, as well as the need to actually repair the roof and not allow water to drip through it. If you said to them, "well, maybe we should think about repairing the roof," they would say, "The problem is clearly the water -- you can see the water, here's a measurement of the water." They might even say if you don't aggressively treat this excessive water, you're going to end up flooding your entire house.

In contrast to that, a naturopathic approach involves a little more investigative work. A naturopath would use the dripping water as a clue, but then ask: what is the underlying fundamental cause of this water dripping into the home? The naturopathic physician would trace the water back to the stain in the ceiling, and this stain would indicate that water has been chronically dripping in from a leaky roof. Then, he would trace it through the attic to the roof and find a hole in the roof. After a bit of detective work, he (or she) would decide to patch the hole, repair the roof and stop the leaking water at its source.


Treat the problem, not the symptom
Naturopaths aren't treating the water -- the symptom -- and this confuses conventional medicine to a great degree. They don't understand how someone can treat cancer without treating the tumor itself. Because conventional docs think the symptom is the disease or the disorder. But naturopathic medicine sees the cancer tumor as only a symptom of a much deeper problem. Just like the water dripping into the home is only a symptom of a broken roof in need of repair, a cancer tumor is only a symptom of a serious underlying metabolic problem.

The naturopathic physician would fix the cause of the problem, but they wouldn't stop there. They would also realize that if the roof has one hole in it now, it seems likely that there could be other holes that are beginning to form, too. They would look at it from a holistic perspective and work to not only solve today's problems, but also prevent the development of other chronic degenerative problems that share the same cause.

Conventional medicine, having ignored the leaky roof in the first place, would play a game of prescribing a never-ending chain of treatments to mask all the various water disorders, each of which would be given a unique disease name. If water dripped onto your wooden furniture, it would be called something like Furniture Disease, whereas if the same water dripped on your carpet, they might call it Soggy Carpet Disease. No matter what the water dripped on, conventional medicine would have a different name and a different treatment for it. Even though all these problems have the same common cause (the leaky roof), medicine would find a way to turn it into a dozen different diseases and treatment plans, all while completely ignoring the root cause.

Naturopathic physicians and Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioners, on the other hand, will listen to their patient's symptoms but not necessarily treat those symptoms directly. Sometimes they even appear to ignore the symptoms completely, even though they are in actuality looking beyond them and treating the fundamental causes of the disease. There are really only a few basic causes of all disease. Conventional medicine has over ten thousand names for various diseases, but these are merely symptomatic descriptions. Every single one of them is based on one of the following three causes:

Number one: the body (or the mind) doesn't have something it needs, such as nutrition, oxygen, air, sunlight, love, sleep, etc.

Number two: the body (or mind) has too much of something it can't use or is toxic.

Number three: the body (or mind) doesn't have the proper flow, either energetically or physically. This means it cannot remove metabolic waste products, nourish cells with fresh blood, or neurologically respond to a stimulus.

No matter what symptoms you present at the doctor's office, the naturopathic physician will investigate the root causes of disease: your exposure to toxic chemicals, your levels of chronic stress and the health of your relationships, your level of physical exercise, and your exposure to sunlight, fresh air and fresh water, among other factors. These are simple causative factors, but when they are out of balance, deficient, or present in excess, they combine to create all the different biochemical problems that conventional medicine labels as disease. In other words, these three causes can combine in ten thousand different ways, creating ten thousand different symptoms, and conventional medicine has invented a name for each one.

But treating disease is wasted effort if it remains focused on the symptoms. Preventing disease is sort of like doing basic maintenance on your home; it's something you have to do routinely, something you do preemptively to prevent disease from occurring. And you have to cover all the basics: nutrition, exercise, avoidance of toxic chemicals, avoidance of chronic stress, good flow and circulation, and a healthy mind and emotional state. These things go together to create a healthy body and mind.

This fundamental idea -- which is centuries old and was understood in China thousands of years before the rise of modern pharmacology -- remains utterly neglected by modern medical science. Today's medical practitioners cannot grasp this simple concept, and they still insist that there are more than 10,000 different diseases, each requiring specific chemical or surgical treatments.

It's like running around a leaky house with a pail trying to catch all of the drops of water while billing Medicare for the cost of the pails. It would be better to simply fix the roof. But knowing that the roof is leaking requires some detective work, and conventional medicine has abandoned anything resembling real detective work. Today, it's all about identifying and treating the symptoms, then waiting for the patient to return with more symptoms caused by the treatments used on the first round of symptoms.

Someday, this whole system of modern medicine will be looked upon as quite foolish. Because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that fixing the leaky roof is the best way to prevent water from dripping into your home.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 13:22 11 April 2007

Information on vitamin D: deficiency and related diseases, exposure to sunlight, etc. SAD and depression are mentioned. There are widespread deficiencies in this important vitamin throughout the higher latitudes, and most people are not aware of the consequences of this -- or of how valuable a little sunlight exposure can be.

http://downloads.truthpublishing.com/Sunlight.pdf
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 20:18 24 April 2007

This article is essentially about carcinogens (cancer-causing compunds) in foods, but I think it's just as relevant to sufferers of depression. If you include foods like these in your diet then they can end up wreaking havoc over time, and any number of symptoms can result, including depression and mental illness. So the next time you get the SAD-fuelled carb cravings, the info in this article is worth bearing in mind. True, one donut may not kill you -- but "one donut" here and there, along with other unhealthy foods, over 20 or 30 years or more, is a sure recipe for disaster.

Top cancer-causing foods:

http://www.newstarget.com/021808.html
samleona
joined 6 Apr 2006
18 posts

send a pm

Posted by samleona, 12:48 30 April 2007

Hi linda,

I said ages ago I'd report back on how I got on. Unfortunately my will power was non existant and my cravings were too bad to be able to control what I was eating very well, although I managed to intergrate some better foods in amongst the rubbish. I still believe that changing my diet will make a big difference.
I've decided to start changing what I eat during the summer while I'm feeling good so that hopefully by next winter it will be more of a habit and easier to keep to. I can't believe it won't make me feel better.

Thank you for posting these articles they are really useful.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 13:18 30 April 2007

I've been there too, I totally understand.

The past 3 months were rough for me as well. But I think it can be a signal that we still need to look for answers. I am trying like mad to secure some kind of teaching job for the autumn because no matter what else I do, the depression isn't going to lift until I get out of the house and get back to work. It helped when I worked 6 weeks last autumn but I had to quit because of overstimulation problems due to what my antidepressant had done to me when I discontinued it. That was a year ago now. Fingers crossed that things will be better with time having passed.

It sounds like you've got a good plan and are doing great. Diet alone often isn't enough though, especially for people who are having problems like depression. You could try looking into some supplements. There's some info in this topic, though I probably ought to look at that and revise it as I'm always learning more. And there's a wealth of info on the internet. If you have the good fortune of being able to access a naturopath in your area, that's probably the best thing of all to do. I've also been reading this book; it's from the US but was well worth getting, I've learned a lot from it:

Depression Cured At Last by Sherry Rogers M.D.
https://prestigepublishing.northlandcom.com/cgi-bin/html_web_store/html_web_store.cgi?page=depress.htm&cart_id=3998726.19334

Hope this helps. I bet you'll be feeling a lot better soon. It's been an incredibly sunny spring. Sometimes it just needs a little bit more intensity to help those of us who are really sunk LOL.

Take care,
Linda.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 16:47 30 April 2007

Just trying to think about what I've learned since I've started this topic. The "Depression Cured at Last" book is excellent, but I can't exactly copy it all here. I want to try to avoid being too narrow in focus as well, because everyone's biochemistry is individual. I'm pretty strict with what I eat because I know that works well with my body. It isn't going to be the ideal for everybody. Having said that, there are good general guidelines to follow, such as not eating white flour, sugar, or processed foods. I felt better and my irritable bowel syndrome disappeared BEFORE I went on Paleo -- when all I did was have whole wheat instead of white flour products, and no sugar. You've got to be careful to hunt out the sugar though. Manufacturers put it in almost everything. I challenge you, especially if you are in the USA, to find a can of anything, or a loaf of bread, or a condiment, or a ready-meal, that doesn't contain sugar as well as other chemicals such as MSG. Home cooking is so, so worth the effort. I never knew what proper bolognaise sauce tasted like until I made it from scratch using just onions, garlic, fresh tomatoes, salt, basil, and lots of olive oil. I never knew the taste of real homemade meat stock until I made my own, and believe me I'd never want to touch a stock cube again.

Anyway, I'm digressing. What else can I talk about? OK . . .

Checklist for causes of depression. Things your doctor should go over with you or ask you but almost certainly wouldn't.

Dietary causes, nutritional deficiencies. There are tests for these using hair, urine or blood. Some deficiencies are so common that you may as well supplement for them by default, e.g. vitamin C, magnesium, and omega-3.

Underlying medical conditions. Your doctor should offer you a thorough physical checkup. You could have a hormone deficiency or thyroid dysfunction. Other diseases can also cause depression as a symptom, including cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. Sometimes depression can show up before you are aware that these other conditions are developing. The body is a whole, living organism, and all of its systems are interconnected. What is happening in one part of your body can affect other parts.

Allergies, including food allergies. You may not know you have a food allergy. Sometimes craving a certain food is an indication that you have an allergy. You can test yourself by eliminating certain foods one at a time for a week or so and see how it affects you. Good things to start with are grain and dairy, as these are the most common. I know of a case where a woman presenting psychotic symptoms became "normal" when she stopped drinking milk. The nose can be one target organ of an allergy, but any organ can actually be a target, including the brain. Your brain can't sneeze, but it can exhibit a wide variety of symptoms that would be classified as mental illness.

Toxins, ingested or environmental. Our bodies do not handle white flour or sugar well. Many chemicals are put in processed foods that aren't so good for us either, like MSG, which is a neurotoxin; or sodium nitrite, which is a carcinogen added to processed meats from hot dogs to bacon to make them look pink and fresh. Then there are things like alcohol and drugs. A surprising array of chemicals in the environment can also cause depression. People who have SAD, listen up:

It is not unknown for some people to have an adverse reaction to the sort of gas that is used to heat the home or for cooking. When do we tend to heat our homes? In the winter. It is a possibility that what you are labelling as SAD is a reaction to a toxin that is more prevalent in your environment in the winter, such as the gas that heats your home.

There are many other toxins to consider too. Probably the best way to address the subject for yourself is to think of when your depression or SAD cycle started, and ask yourself if it coincided with a change in your environment. Did you move house? Start a new job? Were either of those places being renovated? New carpets "outgas" chemicals. So do drapes and paint. Especially if the ventilation is poor, these can build up. I've read about a case of a woman who worked in a car park booth at a hospital and developed depression. She saw 4 experts at that hospital, they did many tests, and eventually labelled her as a hypochondriac because they couldn't figure out what was wrong with her. She saw a naturopath who worked out -- it didn't take long -- that the woman was being poisoned by inhaling carbon monoxide fumes daily. The levels in her blood were way above normal. This was remedied when she showed the test results to her employers, who agreed to install proper ventilation in the cark park booth.

Side effects of medications can cause depression. Almost any medication has the capacity to do this because it is a foreign agent in the system, and the body reacts to it as such. Statins have been known to cause depression, as have beta-blockers, and of course psychotropic drugs, even the ones that are actually supposed to relieve those depressive symptoms. Sometimes they can instead make them worse. In many cases, these medications aren't even necessary. With the right nutritional and lifestyle changes, the medications can be eliminated and you could end up feeling a whole lot better. This isn't the case 100% of the time, but probably 90% of the time. This estimate was given to me by a naturopath.

Then, of course, there are lifestyle factors to consider. Relationship problems, job dissatisfaction, loneliness, boredom, the death of a friend or loved one, frustration born of whatever cause -- depression can be a natural response to these.

There's so much more to say . . . I'll have a think.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 20:35 30 April 2007

Other possible causes of depression:

Damage to the body from prescription medications. For example, some people who have taken psychotropic drugs end up being more prone to depression, even if it was not the original problem. Drugs can change a person's system in many ways, and healing can be incomplete if the body is not getting enough of the right nutrients.

Problems with gut flora and candida overgrowth. (Also see Leaky Gut Syndrome.) Candida is a fungus that is normally benign in the intestine; but when a person's body is in a weakened state for whatever reason -- for example, through an antibiotic killing off other healthy gut flora -- it can proliferate and start filling the system with its toxic by-products. It can also be fed by too much sugar in the diet.

Exposure to electromagnetic fields, e.g. living in a house near a pylon, or sleeping with your head against a wall where cables run.

Heavy metal toxicity. Some common sources are mercury amalgam dental fillings, contaminated tapwater, and chemicals in the workplace. There are tests that can determine amounts in the body. It is a good idea to get mercury amalgam fillings replaced whether or not they are the source of the problem, as they add to the total load of chemicals your body must detoxify daily. They can also cause problems with galvanism, especially if the composition of the fillings varies from one to the next.

There are many more possible causes of depression. It's important to take into consideration anything that could be throwing your system off balance. A good naturopath with a knowledge of nutritional and environmental medicine should be able to go through a checklist with you, if you find yourself uncertain about how to proceed, or feel you've tried many things but nothing seems to be working.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 22:04 30 April 2007

"So why can't I get all the nutrients I need from a healthy diet? Surely there isn't a need to take supplements if I'm getting my 5-a-day fruit and veg."

"How can anyone be so sure that there are widespread nutritional deficiencies? We don't exactly see people dropping dead of scurvy on the streets of New York or London."

"I've eaten a healthy diet all my life. There's no way I can have nutritional deficiencies. This is all nonsense."

*********

First of all, a lot of people who claim to have a healthy diet, don't. I've written several posts here about this, and have shared links and articles. It's something that can be easily researched.

So, if you really do feel you are eating healthily and are still thinking the sorts of things I've written above, please read on.

First, when I talk about nutritional deficiencies, I don't just mean the classic deficiency diseases such as scurvy, anemia, and pellagra. Indeed these are no longer common in the developed world. RDA amounts have been calculated based on these -- they are the minimal amounts of any nutrient that will prevent the associated deprivation disease. They are not, however, the optimal amounts for human health. Most vitamins are safe to consume in many times the quantities prescribed by the RDA, and indeed some of them need to be in order to be of real benefit. Deficiency diseases may be rare in this day and age, but marginal deficiencies are more common than most people realise. Marginal deficiencies of vitamins and minerals can cause a huge variety of symptoms to manifest. A common one -- you guessed it -- is depression.

Why are the RDAs not higher then? One reason is because conventional medicine does not recognise the importance of diet and nutrients in maintaining good health. Vitamins cannot be patented. Pharmaceutical companies have no interest in getting people to take them, and would rather see people taking prescription drugs because that is how they make money. Pharmaceutical companies are in charge of what doctors learn in medical school. They learn how to diagnose and prescribe drugs. They do not learn why it is important to ask a patient about their diet. And so it goes. But let's get back to the topic at hand: nutritional deficiencies.

Common causes of nutritional deficiencies, and why they are more common than most people realise:

The state of your mother's nutritional health while she was pregnant with you can have a big effect on your own nutritional state of health. Nutritional deficiencies can be passed on from mother to child. And indeed, unless a woman eats a healthy diet and takes the time and care to replenish her reserves bewteen children, then subsequent children are likely to have worse deficiencies. I would like to see a study done on large families in which mental illness occurs. My bet is that the younger children are more prone to it. In fact, I've read some interesting ideas regarding mental health and the passing on of nutritional deficiencies. Many people believe, or are led to believe, that certain mental illnesses are genetic. You might say, for example, that bipolar disorder runs in your family. Or that a disproportionate number of people in your family suffer from mental illness, so it is not surprising that you do too. What you could really be inheriting is a genetic disposition to express a nutritional deficiency as bipolar disorder. You haven't inherited bipolar disorder as such, you have inherited the nutritional deficiency that manifests itself with those symptoms. This should be an incredibly empowering idea because it means that instead of accepting bipolar disorder as something you must live with and perhaps medicate the rest of your life, it can be seen as something that is within your power to cure.

Another cause of nutritional deficiencies which is more well known and mainstream is the actual state of being pregnant. The growing baby puts huge demands on the mother's reserves. If her system is lacking in a nutrient like calcium, then the baby will cause it to be taken from her bones in order to meet its own growing needs. What is known as post partum depression is often a consequence of nutritional deficiencies plus hormonal fluctuations, often exacerbated by poor diet. These women do not need antidepressants. What they desperately need is the nutrition that will put their bodies back in balance.

Biochemical individuality. It is a fact recognised by orthomolecular doctors and naturopaths that each person has a unique biochemistry. Some people need higher intakes of certain nutrients than others in order to be healthy. You may be taking in the "average" amount of a substance, which equals or exceeds the RDA, without being aware that your body actually needs more. Another possible reason why mental illness can seem to run in families. These needs for certain nutrients can run in families too. A good healthy diet, supplements, and trial and error can often help a person to discover what works with their body.

Medications. As mentioned above, the body sees these as foreign agents. The body has to use nutrients to metabolise them, and it also takes nutrients to detoxify them from the system. Any medication is likely to exacerbate exisitng nutritional deficiencies for these reasons. They can also have other direct adverse effects on the body, depending on what they are designed to do. Antacids, for example, can block the absorption of minerals and actually cause deficiencies where none previously existed.

Environmental toxins. I read an estimate by a specialist in environmental medicine which said that we expose our bodies, on average, to 500 chemicals a day. They were never designed to routinely handle such a toxic load. It puts a strain on the system, and detoxifying these chemicals from the body takes nutrients. When those nutrients are used in detoxification, they cannot be used elsewhere in the body, for example to make mood-lifting compounds in the brain. We need to ingest more nutrients than we did in the past if we are to function optimally in modern living conditions. For most people this means taking supplements.

The modern Western diet is not as nutrient-rich as the diet with which our ancestors evolved. The most nutrient-rich foods we can eat include vegetables, fruits, meats, fats, nuts, and several other things, some of which many of us would not think of ingesting today (e.g. insects). We have displaced these foods with others that are more nutirent-poor, including grains, potatoes, refined sugar, processed and junk foods. Some of these things have nutrients, but they fall far short of the amounts we would otherwise be getting if we were to satiate ourselves instead with more nutritious foods.

The sad truth is that even when we make a conscious effort to eat nutrient-rich foods like vegetables and fruit, those things do not contain as many vitamins and minerals as they did even a generation ago. I have posted some articles and links about this. You would have to eat two, three, or even four oranges today to get the same amount of nutrition you would have got from one orange grown 100 years ago. It really is a matter of eating more and still starving. The blame largely seems to fall on modern methods of intensive farming. Commercial fertilisers are only required to replace a handful of minerals in the soil. But virgin soil can contain upwards of 70 minerals, many of which are needed for human health in trace amounts. This again is a reason why all but the very healthiest people need to take supplements if they want to achieve optimal wellness.

Things we ingest can rob our bodies of nutrients. Phosphates from processed foods and soda pop can prevent the absorption of calcium, which can lead to osteoporosis (and remember that a deficiency of any vitamin or mineral can also manifest as depression). White sugar contains no nutrients itself, it has nothing to give to the body, but it has plenty to take because the body must use nutrients to metabolise it. There are many more examples that can be found.

When there is an imbalance of nutrients in the body, this can exacerbate deficiencies until things snowball out of control. An imbalance in nutrients can lead to malabsorption of other nutrients. This causes another deficiency. And on and on. For example, a lack of zinc, copper, boron, magnesium, or any combination of these, can lead to malabsorption of calcium. The standard treatment for osteoporosis is to give calcium. Few doctors think to look for an absorption problem. If this exists, then it doesn't matter how much calcium there is in the system already -- there may be plenty -- but it cannot be used. What cannot be used is stored in places like the blood vessels. So giving calcium for osteoporosis can result in calcification of the arteries. What actually needs to be addressed is the deficiency of minerals that make it possible for the body to use calcium.

There are many other things that could be covered in this topic. If you want more detail there are a lot of good books out there. I'm not an expert, but I hope that what I've said here shows what anyone can learn in a year if they are willing.

The last thing I'd like to mention is leaky gut syndrome. Until recently I didn't even know of its existence. Not that I do, I can see that it is potentially a very serious problem, and also is likely a very common one, though many people are unaware that they have it. Most doctors deny its very existence, which is not surprising because there are no pharmaceutical drugs to treat it, and most doctors would not know what to do if they couldn't prescribe a drug. (Write you off as a hypochondriac maybe, or give you a nebulous label like chronic fatigue syndrome.)

Leaky gut syndrome can cause a host of problems, including multiple nutritional deficiencies. This puts a lot of stress on the body and can lead to the development of degenerative diseases. In brief, here is how.

A "leaky gut" occurs when the openings between cells in the small intestine become too large, allowing large and partially-digested particles through. These particles are not in a state in which they can be properly absorbed. Other agents which are alien to the body can leak through as well, including bacteria and toxins. There are many bacteria which are benign and even necessary in the gut, which become toxic when they enter any other part of the body. What is more, the immune system may not recognise the leaking particles as bits of food that are harmless, and mount an attack. Your body then starts to see this food as a pathogen and can develop an allergic reaction to it, when up to this point in your life you ate the food with no ill effects at all.

There is a variety of possible causes of leaky gut syndrome. They can include: overuse of antibiotics (which kill beneficial gut flora), steroids, and NSAIDS (aspirin, ibuprofen, etc); a poor diet, high in processed foods and nutritional deficiencies (another example of the chicken-and-egg scenario); incomplete digestion; exposure to environmental toxins; stress; and parasites.

We have already seen that nutritional deficiencies can lead to depression. Other symptoms of leaky gut syndrome include: candida overgrowth, allergies, a weakened immune system, chronic fatigue syndrome; irritable bowel syndrome, and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus.

It's impossible to get a drug to fix leaky gut syndrome. It can be cured; but like other points discussed here, the solution involves work, education, and a willingness to change. It requires a shift to a healthier diet, as well as consumption of beneficial bacteria and various nutrients. There is a lot of info out there if you want to reseearch further, and again a good naturopath should be able to help you diagnose the specific problem and start healing your body.

I am still looking into ways of finding help in the UK. Naturopaths seem to be few and far between, and somehow I doubt they're available on the NHS. I'm pretty sure my own depression stems from things in my life circumstances that need changing, but I still research it in case there's something I may have missed. I also know that my future health, and that of my husband and daughter, depends on my knowledge of nutrition, and also my knowledge of where to get help if I need it. I'm not past seeing my GP, he can get tests done for me. I'm through with asking him to prescribe drugs though, and that's all many doctors are trained to do. Real healing, real medicine, is done at a molecular level with nutrition. How true that cliche, we are what we eat.

More info as I get it :) Best wishes for your good health.

Linda.
Louise
Louise
joined 1 Mar 2006
95 posts

send a pm

Posted by Louise, 11:06 2 May 2007

Hello, it's been a while since I posted but I am having to look at my diet and eat more red meat as I have been diagnosed with anemia. This can feel very much like depression as you feel extremely tired and are prone to catching every bug there is around.

However the weather has made a difference as I do feel much more energetic since the sun has been shining. My light box has made a difference this winter so I've probably had SAD and anemia, at least I now feel that with the sun shining and changing my diet I can start to feel normal again and hopefully feel even better for next winter.

Thank you Linda for highlighting nutrition as women especially (because of loss of blood in menustration) can be prone to low iron levels which causes general fatique. I wouldn't have known my iron levels were so low if I hadn't have fainted and gone to the doctors as a result.

Hope everyone is feeling well with this lovely run of good weather. Long may it continue!

Louise
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 20:38 2 May 2007

That sounds like a nasty experience Louise. I'm glad you got to the bottom of it. Fortunately, iron-deficient anemia is something that doctors are pretty good at picking up and testing for. Why it should be iron and not other vitamins and minerals as well, I don't know. I've had problems with anemia in the past too and I know what the fatigue and fog are like. Red meat sounds like a good deal; I'm told that it helps much more than any iron supplements you could take, which are poorly absorbed. Liver is an excellent source.

Any idea what was causing your anemia?

Good luck with the diet and nutrition regime. You might find that the SAD is a lot less of a problem once those issues are addressed. It can be a big learning process. There are those stories we all like to hear of someone who found the magic bullet and instantly felt better. More often it takes digging around, self education, trial and error. I've tried to put the main things I've learned here in this topic but I still learn something new almost every day.

Sun is shining here too, it's great :)

Linda.
Louise
Louise
joined 1 Mar 2006
95 posts

send a pm

Posted by Louise, 10:01 3 May 2007

Hi Linda

My anemia is most likely caused by heavy periods, so I have been given some tablets which has helped with this. My doctor wishes to tackle the cause of the anemia rather than prescribing iron tablets, so I also have to change my diet. I still feel terribly drained at times but hope this will lessen when my iron levels rise. I've been told it will take at least 3 months for my iron to get to where it should be as it is quite low and I am being monitored with regular blood tests. I've been impressed with the doctors, they do seem good at finding out deficiencies in iron.

I agree, I do think my SAD will be much better when my iron level is normal, I've been blaming all my tiredness on SAD but now I wonder!

Hope you are making a good recovery with your nutrition regime.

All the best
Louise
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 12:23 3 May 2007

Hmmmm liver . . . cheap and healthy. It was prized by ancient people. Don't know why it seems to have fallen out of favour today.

I used to hate it until I found a way of cooking it that I like. I chop it up and marinade it in lemon juice, soy sauce and red wine for several hours. Then fry a couple of onions and a tomato or two in olive oil. Add the juices from the liver marinade and reduce them. Then add the liver and cook for three or four minutes -- the short cooking time seems to improve the texture and flavour.

You can have it raw in a tonic too, haven't tried that myself . . .

Good luck :)
Linda.
Louise
Louise
joined 1 Mar 2006
95 posts

send a pm

Posted by Louise, 16:13 3 May 2007

Thanks I'll give your receipe a try, it sounds good but I'll give raw liver a miss I think! I've been drinking guinness as it is supposed to have iron in it, and been cooking things like steak and kidney, lasagne with minced beef etc as well as trying to eat more greens. I was also advised by the doctor to eat black pudding.

Fortunately I'm not vegetarian (that would be very difficult in this situation), and actually like liver, kidney, black pudding, steaks etc but never really ate them that much.

A trip to the butchers beckons!

Hope you are keeping well Linda

Louise
Suzie
Suzie
joined 26 Jan 2007
462 posts

send a pm

Posted by Suzie, 19:28 17 May 2007

NOTE TO LINDA:

Can I ask you to read the topic here called Nutrition Info, particularly the last few messages? I've been going through a lot of education this past year or so, and I've read some good books, and I've made a sort of checklist of many things you can take into consideration if you feel depressed. In your case I think it's well worth looking at what is happening in your life when you make the transition from feeling OK to feeling awful.


I am not going to get into a dicussion with you on the the post where this advice was posted.

This is a 13 year old child that is obviously in despair, who may be looking for answers. Nevertheless, you should not be directing a child to Nutrition Info or any other biased information. As an adult we are able to make an informed decision. As a mixed up, depressed child you are not.
For god sake Linda offer a shoulder to cry on or a lend an ear but Nutrition Info is something you should keep to yourself in this case.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 20:25 17 May 2007

Excuse me but this info is here to help people. How is it in any way dangerous to a 13 year old? Maybe you don't go along with anything I've written here and that is your choice, but it is also other peoples' choices to read it and take what they will from it. I can't see how anything I said to this particular person was inappropriate.
Suzie
Suzie
joined 26 Jan 2007
462 posts

send a pm

Posted by Suzie, 20:56 17 May 2007

This article is essentially about carcinogens (cancer-causing compunds) in foods, but I think it's just as relevant to sufferers of depression. If you include foods like these in your diet then they can end up wreaking havoc over time, and any number of symptoms can result, including depression and mental illness. So the next time you get the SAD-fuelled carb cravings, the info in this article is worth bearing in mind. True, one donut may not kill you -- but "one donut" here and there, along with other unhealthy foods, over 20 or 30 years or more, is a sure recipe for disaster
Top cancer-causing foods:




Death By Medicine
A definitive review and close reading of medical peer-review journals, and government health statistics shows that American medicine frequently causes more harm than good.


Two examples of what I don't think a vulnerable, mixed up child should be reading. As usual, your normal scaremongering.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 21:10 17 May 2007

So it's more appropriate for her to possibly end up on an antidepressant is it? Rather than look for the reasons why she is feeling poorly?

You accuse me of being biased, but calling what I am saying "scaremongering" is also biased. I maintain that this young person appears to have enough intelligence to make her mind up for herself, and hopefully with the support of family and friends she will be OK. However, soothing her with sympathetic words while shielding her delicate ears or eyes from information that could actually help her seems irresponsible.

It is clear you don't agree with what I am saying, but I maintain that other people have the right to come here and decide for themselves. I am going to continue to direct people to this topic where it seems appropriate; and if you have found information that directly contradicts what I have written here, by all means contribute.
Suzie
Suzie
joined 26 Jan 2007
462 posts

send a pm

Posted by Suzie, 08:02 18 May 2007

Linda we will have to agree to disagree.

Just one question - If your approach to nutrional information and anti-depressent info is such a success and you adopt this approach to your illness why are you still suffering depression as much as the rest of us?

I applaud you for trying to take an alternative approach to helping yourself and others but your approach to this is very blinkered and I have to disagree with the way you approach these subjects like you are on a one woman mission.
PurpleIvy
PurpleIvy
joined 16 Mar 2005
855 posts

send a pm

Posted by PurpleIvy, 08:49 18 May 2007

So it's more appropriate for her to possibly end up on an antidepressant is it? Rather than look for the reasons why she is feeling poorly?



I didn't see anywhere in Marshmallow's text that she is going to be put on antidepressants. It's just what you imagine will happen. It seems she is engaged in talking therapies at the moment.

Like Suzie, I have long wondered why you push nutrition so hard, when it is obvious that as a therapy it isn't working for you. Why would we take it seriously when it isn't working for the person recommending it.

I follow a pretty healthy diet, because I feel well on it, but I don't obsess.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 09:48 18 May 2007

Suzie, I'm depressed because I am waiting for the opportunity to change my life circumstances. It took me a long time to realise that at the heart of my problems lies the fact that being a stay-at-home mum has left me feeling bored and lonely, however much I love my little girl. The depression lifted during the 6 weeks I worked last autumn but unfortunately I had to quit the job due to problems caused by withdrawal from my antidepressant. I am hoping that time and an acceptance of my limitations will allow me to work part time this autumn; I have been actively looking for a teaching job for that time.

On the journey I have met many other people who have experienced depression for a wide variety of reasons, and they have shared with me what they have done to address their own problems. People with a lot of knowledge have shared some of it with me. I've been recommended some very good books, and have also done a lot of research on my own. Personal resentment at the drug I was on has little to do with what I am doing now. What I feel is a desire to share what I have learned with people whom it may benefit. There are very few people who seem to want to consider the idea that there could, and should, be more to modern medicine than diagnosing/labelling and prescribing a drug.

Consider a couple of the anecdotes I've described in this topic. One woman was self-harming. Another had "treatment-resistant" depression. Their doctors could not find anything wrong with them physically. The conventional approach would have been to put them on psychiatric drugs. This would, at best, have masked some of their symptoms. Even psychotherapy or counselling would not have been of huge benefit, because their problems were physical. The woman who was self-harming had a vitamin deficiency. The other woman who was depressed was being poisoned by carbon monoxide at her workplace. Once these issues were addressed, these women were no longer mentally ill. They were lucky to have got the help they needed. If our doctors continue to take the approach of labelling an illness and prescribing a "suitable" drug, then the needs of many people for a real and lasting cure that ought to be just within reach will not be addressed. What could possibly be the harm of coming to a topic like this and questioning a number of factors in one's life, when the alternative could be a lifetime of mental illness and psychiatric drugs?

It's so easy to look to the doctor as the expert who ought to have all the answers. That is what we are raised to believe. All you have to do is dip a little into the profession's history, though, to see that handing total responsibility for one's health over to someone else can be dangerous. A hundred years ago or so, doctors were prescribing opium and cocaine. Indeed cocaine was so mainstream that it was one of the original ingredients in Coca-Cola (hence the name, as you probably know). Not long ago doctors were also prescribing tobacco. Most of them would not have accepted the idea that it could be so harmful as to seriously endanger human health. How many people would have laughed at you if you'd suggested such a thing? Would they have called you a scaremonger, do you think? Because conventional wisdom, what most everyone else thought they knew, would have gone against you.

Today there is a pill for every ill. Doctors are very good at diagnosing symptoms. Ask them what has caused the symptoms, though, and you won't get such easy answers. Now what is more preferable, treating symptoms with drugs while the original problem continues, or stopping the original problem at the source? It is fact that a magnesium deficiency can cause heart irregularities. And that mental illness is a very common symptom of vitamin B12 deficiency. When a heart patient comes to an ER, one of the first things the doctors often do is administer intravenous magnesium. And it is now becoming more routine to have B12 levels checked in blood tests, and in some enlightened psychiatric hospitals to give B12 injections as standard for new admissions. By the time these emergency measures are taken a lot of damage has already been done. What's sad is that there is so little effort put into prevention, and diet plays a big part in this.

So I ask again, what is wrong with trying to find out if someone is deficient in vitamins or minerals? Or that their environment is hazardous to their health? Or that they are eating foods (e.g. hydrogenated fats) that will end up making them sick? This is what our doctors should be asking us. Most of them do not. It is then up to us to find the answers for ourselves.

I'm not saying that I'm against doctors or medication. And I accept that many people will come here and read some of what I've written and think that I'm crazy. What I would, however, ask anyone to do, is keep an open mind and some skepticism. It is dangerous to blindly trust anyone invested with authority -- doctors, politicians, religions leaders, whoever. That's not to say we shouldn't respect their position or knowledge, but that each of us has a brain and needs to use it. Sometimes it can be very relevant to question where these people are coming from, and whether it really is doing us good. Our medical system is largely underpinned by profit-oriented pharmaceutical companies, who have enormous power in Congress, in organisations such as the FDA and AMA, and who largely dictate what doctors learn in medical school and what they prescribe in practice. Is this right? We should be actively debating this right now and we aren't.

We are too focused on treating symptoms with medications, rather than addressing the roots of the problems. This is my view and it's why I will ask people who are depressed to come to this topic and read, and take from it what they will. If someone can avoid taking psychotropic drugs for years by learning that they can change their diet or their environment, or anything else in their lives, in order to be healthy, then I want to do everything I can to facilitate that. None of this knowledge was available to me when I first became depressed. If it was I would have made changes in my own life a lot sooner, and avoided a lot of misery.

Is this being blinkered? On the contrary, for the past year I've felt like the blinkers have been taken off and I am seeing much more of the truth than I ever dreamed existed. Thank the powers that be for the depression, because without it I would not have learned any of these things. They will serve me and my family for years to come. Limited though my knowledge is, I will keep learning, and I want to be able to share as much as I can so that someone else can get the chance to benefit and learn too.
paulst
joined 5 Oct 2005
893 posts

send a pm

Posted by paulst, 15:19 18 May 2007

IM sorry if medication has not worked for you, but for myself and many others it has been a Godsend. I too eat a healthy diet and find it helps me in a supportive role used with my tablets. My advice for what its worth, if you think that you are suffering from deppresion, go and see your doctor, he/she is after all the expert. I cannot praise my doctor enough. He has always given me several choices, some of them dont include medication, but the choice is always there if needed.



paul :)
Suzie
Suzie
joined 26 Jan 2007
462 posts

send a pm

Posted by Suzie, 15:47 18 May 2007

Thank you for your somewhat lengthy response Linda.

Firstly:

It is dangerous to blindly trust anyone invested with authority -- doctors, politicians, religions leaders, whoever. That's not to say we shouldn't respect their position or knowledge, but that each of us has a brain and needs to use it. Sometimes it can be very relevant to question where these people are coming from, and whether it really is doing us good.


It is comments like these that myself and I am sure other people on here find extremely patronising. I certainly dont put all my trust into anyone and always look for alternative ways to help myself. I am also intelligent enough to know that if I am hell bent on putting crap into my body I am the only one who is going to suffer for it.

Secondly:

Our medical system is largely underpinned by profit-oriented pharmaceutical companies, who have enormous power in Congress, in organisations such as the FDA and AMA, and who largely dictate what doctors learn in medical school and what they prescribe in practice. Is this right? We should be actively debating this right now and we aren't.


We have discussed this before. This may happen in the US but the medical system in the UK is somewhat different. In the US the patient (or the patient's insurance) has to pay the medical profession for treatment so they will screw as much money out of the patient as is possible to fund their lavish lifestyles. They put you into rehab for as little as a broken nail. They vet children in schools (something else we have already discussed) so that they can take them into therapy, again to screw money out of somebody to pay for it. You are right, it is all about money.....in the US.

In the UK the NHS pays for it, unless the patient decides that they want to pay privately. In most cases you are lucky to get an asprin from the UK medical profession if you need it. People die waiting around in hospitals because there are no beds, hospital wards are closing every day due to the lack of funds. Doctors and nurses are having to work around the clock due to the lack of staff. Mistakes are made everyday because people are under so much pressure. You cannot compare the two or make a blanket statement about the medical system.

I asked you a question and I thank you for having the courtesy to answer it but unfortunately once again you feel the need to go off on a tangent. Can you not just empathise with how somebody is feeling. Sometimes all that people want is a sympathetic ear, to listen and give a bit of support and understanding to how they feel. Not somebody making them feel inadequate because they stuff a doughnut down their throat when they are having a carb/sugar craving.

These foods are partly what's making so many of you feel so awful.


Surely it doesn't do any good for people to list what they are doing to their bodies in this way, as if it is something slightly naughty like cheating on a diet, that is done with a wink and pleasure with every mouthful. What's more, all these posts tend to give the impression that it really is OK to do this. Indulging in the cravings may silence them short term, but it increases the severity of long-term problems.


Just a couple of examples of your work
paulst
joined 5 Oct 2005
893 posts

send a pm

Posted by paulst, 15:56 18 May 2007

Well said suzie, its very important to have some balance in these postings, and you put it much better than I can. :)


paul
Suzie
Suzie
joined 26 Jan 2007
462 posts

send a pm

Posted by Suzie, 16:05 18 May 2007

Thank you Paulst, although I am sure I will come under a lot of critism for my comments.

I too have been very lucky to have an understanding GP who offered me all the alternatives and allowed me to make an informed decision. At the for front of our discussion was always ways to help myself including diet, nutrition, excercise, counselling and the fact that I could phone her anytime for help and support. She hasn't always got it right but she has done her best and I thank her for that. Without her help and understanding I don't know where I would be now... probably in a wooden box!!

I am glad that both myself and Purplecrab are not the exception as far as the medical profession are concerned. It gives me hope that there are a lot of other people who are well supported by their GP's
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 16:57 18 May 2007

I generally ignore the topics that inevitably get started here each winter where people talk with each other about their favourite carb cravings. I'll make a point of not reading them in future because the people who talk in them aren't going to want anyone telling them that these things are bad for them.

I am not out to preach at people but if they come to this forum saying they feel miserable then I do sympathise and I feel a need to try to help. Maybe some people just want sympathy. I imagine others would actually like to lift their depression if they can.

The drugs in the UK come from the same companies they come from in the US. The two countries are not miles apart. We have different healthcare systems, but the philosophy of diagnose/label and prescribe is exactly the same. It treats symptoms, not the underlying problems.

No comments here have addressed what I said about the people who were cured of their conditions by taking a vitamin and cleaning up the work environment. I am trying to show here that there are alternatives to meds and that ignoring the roots of a problem can perpatuate it. I don't see how anyone can logically say that this is nonsense.

You may decide that you are happy with your doctor and your medications. I'm absolutely clear on that and I know I'm not going to change your minds. And no one arrives at the answers that are right for them without going down the path of their own choosing. What I am tired of is the same handful of people telling me that what I am saying is nuts. If this approach is not for you then that's fine. I am keeping most of what I write in this topic and in Antidepressant Info so that people can choose to read it if they want, or ignore it if they want.

Again let's please live and let live. I would not set out to criticise either of you for how you are dealing with your personal issues, but you seem to think that is what is happening when you choose to talk to me within these topics. Of course you will find comments here that are different from choices you yourselves would make. If we can stick to encountering each other in more neutral topics then I think we'd probably all be happier.
Suzie
Suzie
joined 26 Jan 2007
462 posts

send a pm

Posted by Suzie, 18:36 18 May 2007

No comments here have addressed what I said about the people who were cured of their conditions by taking a vitamin and cleaning up the work environment. I am trying to show here that there are alternatives to meds and that ignoring the roots of a problem can perpatuate it. I don't see how anyone can logically say that this is nonsense.


What proof do you have other than the fact that it is something that you have read? How do you know this was not just a coincidence and these people would not have got better anyway? Do you know these people? My friends daughter self harmed..... she doesn't do it anymore. I am not saying she won't do it again in the future, I can't guarantee that. How can anyone guarantee these people are cured, how does anyone know they won't relapse in the future? Is an article going to be written about these people should they relapse and start self harming again saying "oh dear we were wrong, it didn't actually work". I very much doubt it and if it was, would you post it in your topic, most definately not! This is the area we disagree on!

We are advised by yourself that the information we read in Dr Rosenthal's book is "nonsense" and does nothing to help get to the root of the problems only mask them and temporarily relieve them. Why then is some of the information you post on here not nonsense. At the end of the day it is all literature, no one knows how much of it is factual and how much of it is just spin.

You are talking to someone who suffers from ME. I know the importance of vitamin and mineral deficiencies, toxin overloads. All the things to avoid, stimulants, chemicals, additives, etc That good nutrition is fundamental to optimum health. This alone does not erradicate depressive illness. It goes someway to helping you feel better. There is always an underlying reason for depressive illness as you have said yourself many times before. YOU can't prove that depression is not a chemical imbalance. You can only print what you have read. Both you and I can only take on board what we read. Neither of us have the qualifications or knowledge to prove that any of it is factual.

I don't disrespect you or what you are trying to do. I applaud your commitment to this topic. My only disagreement with what you do is that it is not balanced information and you cannot prove that any of it.

You put all this information on a thread you have to be open to debate.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 20:43 18 May 2007

OK we can debate, though I think it would be hard not to let it get acrimonious. I think it might be better if we say we aren't going to agree.

You've reminded me of something I read when I came across a little entertainment recently in the form of a biography of L. Ron Hubbard. He said that the truth is what you believe it to be. If you say that we can't take as factual anything we've read and that we really don't know what is true, where does that leave us? OK, so nothing I've said in this topic could be true, and I could be completely a different person from who I say I am. I think we have to take information in and decide what is rational.

I would not base what I'm saying here on one thing I'd read in a book, or one book written by one person, just as I would not visit a web page and decide that everything on it was factual and reliable. What most people do when researching on the web is they read many different sources of information, and if the same info comes up again and again, it's likely to have truth to it. Not always of course. Depends on what you are researching. But that's what I've done on this topic; I've tried to share what I've learned from a variety of sources.

I may not be able to report on the people from the books I've read and how they got on, but I have met real people who have histories of mental illness and who have not had problems for a decade or longer. Recovery is certainly possible. Sometimes it takes a professional who really knows how to address all possible causes of the problem, who understands what the patient's limitations may be due to medical problems, or drug history, or whatever. And yes it's ideal when that person is a doctor. Much of the info in this topic has come from doctors or has involved doctors. Some of them really do have a holistic grasp of healing, health, and the human body. Unfortunately they are quite rare.

It was a doctor who told me that recovery from mental illness, not involving drugs, is possible. Some doctors are well known for their successful work with the mentally ill. Abram Hoffer is one, and he's worth looking up. His particular success has come from curing the symptoms of schizophrenia by using niacin (vitamin B3) and vitamin C. It is not a blanket cure because everyone is an individual, but he has helped a lot of people.

Some cases are obviously more complicated than others. I have met some people who felt a lot better just by cutting sugar and white flour out of their diets. In general they were not very ill to begin with. Sometimes a problem has multiple causes. I think it's sensible to say that your ME has complicated things for you, and that improving your health is going to take more than popping a multivitamin once a day. I don't pretend to know much about ME and I wouldn't claim I had answers for you. I would, however, say that I don't think depression is supposed to be part of the human condition, and that there can be hope of things improving for you.

I have been told that if light therapy for up to an hour a day does not lift SAD, then there are other issues that need addressing. I trust the authority that this came from, but I do not have facts to back it up and it's something that people here can choose to believe, or not. My experience of talking with people and reading posts here does bear out the idea that many who come here have other factors complicating their condition.

Also, I have read about various studies done on the remaining aboriginal populations of the world, who sustain their traditional diets and ways of life. They tend to be healthy people who on the whole do not experience degenerative diseases like diabetes or heart disease; they tend to have a good set of teeth without cavities; and mental illness is rare. There has been a lot of speculation about why these things should be the case. My own opinion is that something about how we live now, which has changed from how these people live, is causing increasing numbers of us to be ill. It's bound to be a whole spectrum of things, including pollution of our environment, splintered families and social alienation, the stress of modern life, and poor diet. If we attempt to address some of those issues then I think it's logical we can start to feel better. When a person is really desperately ill then they may systematically have to go through a whole gamut of possible causes, but I believe those causes can eventually be found. I have been doing so in my own case because I need to get well. I am positive that getting a job will be a huge help; but that is going to take time, and I may as well look at all possible options. I will be getting my amalgam fillings replaced next month. All 4 of them were put in at the same time, and about 2 months later the depression struck. It is probably coincidence but just in case it isn't, I feel I need to pursue that particular avenue.

False optimism, saying that if you seek you will find? Personally I don't believe so. It sounds like an easy thing to say, I know. But if you really were keen to look into natural healing, you could start on some of the links I've posted here and maybe try some things and decide for yourself.

It also helps to have advice from people who are knowledgeable. There's the Withdrawal and Recovery site. There's also, I discovered, a medical unit in London run by a doctor who studied with Abram Hoffer. They offer various naturopathic services. There are naturopaths around though they can be hard to find, and there are a lot of good books.

Many people say that they've tried the diet/nutrition approach and that it didn't work for them. It depends on what they did. It's easy to rule all of this out if certain aspects didn't work, but that's not to say that a different approach won't work. I used to think I ate a healthy diet but I can see now that it wasn't actually all that healthy. But then we're getting back into areas where we clearly don't see eye to eye. If I told you how you could clean your diet up I expect you wouldn't agree with what I said and would resent me telling you what to do. I hope the links here speak for themselves, there are a number of them that cover aspects of diet.

At the end of the day, none of the things suggested in this topic are going to harm anyone, and they could help. You could say there's no proof they will. You could also say that there's no way for you to know how you will personally react unless you try it for yourself. You've tried a few approaches with diet and nutrition. I doubt if you will have run the whole gamut of possible options. And again, with the ME, it's likely to be a complicated issue for you.

Then again, you might simply say that you don't agree with any of this. That's fine too. It's up to you what you want to do and what you try. My main goal in starting this topic was to share what I have learned, to post links, and to let people take what they want out of it. I suspect that most people who dip into it will think it's outlandish and give it up. A few might be interested in some of the ideas here. That's OK with me. If you want to keep debating what I've said here that's fine too, but arguments are exhausting and I don't know if we're likely to accomplish anything, what did we accomplish the last time we argued? We are both poorly and I don't think either of us needs the agitation.

BTW if you want to get onto the depression-as-chemical imbalance track, I've posted a lot of articles about this in Antidepressant Info. I obviously agree with what they say. It's a big topic and potentially a very emotive one, do you really want to go there? I don't think I do. We'd just get into an argument about the efficacy of meds and I think whatever I said would end up offending you because you feel they have helped you.

We seem to be OK with trying to help others on the forum from our respective points of view. Maybe it's best to stick to that?

Linda.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 07:46 20 May 2007

Hypothyroidism and the Role of Armour Thyroid, Seaweed, Exercise, and More: an interview with Dr. Joseph Mercola

http://www.thyroid-info.com/articles/mercola.htm

A malfunctioning thyroid has been implicated as the core cause of many different kinds of ailments. It can cause depression and SAD-like symptoms. In this article Dr. Mercola discusses the best ways to diagnose hypothyroidism, and some of the best natural treatments available.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 07:59 20 May 2007

"Most diets need supplementation -- Even 'Good' Ones"

http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v01n03.shtml

A brief article explaining the benefits of supplementing.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:05 20 May 2007

A Good Vitamin Supplement Could Be Just What the Doctor Ordered

"Did you ever wish that you could take a vitamin for depression? Well, for some of you it may be just that simple. There are a variety of vitamin deficiencies that can lead to depression symptoms."

http://depression.about.com/cs/diet/a/vitamin.htm

A list of common essential vitamins and minerals, and symptoms of subclinical deficiencies.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:11 20 May 2007

The Toxic Chemicals Most Linked to Depression

http://www.sixwise.com/newsletters/05/06/15/the_toxic_chemicals_most_linked_to_depression.htm

A discussion of chemicals in daily use which can trigger depressive symptoms, including pesticides, solvents, prescription drugs and heavy metals. Includes advice for reducing exposure to each.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:24 20 May 2007

Candida- The Silent Epidemic

"The silent epidemic in the United States is Candida albicans overgrowth. One out of three people are suffering from Candida overgrowth. This condition is continually ignored by Western medicine because it symptoms mimic so many other conditions. It is to be taken seriously and is one of the greatest causes of physical imbalance today."

http://www.annboroch.com/candida.htm

Candida overgrowth can cause symptoms of depression, as well as mood swings, and a myriad of other physical and emotional problems.

This article describes what candida is, how a person can develop overgrowth, what the symptoms are, and how it can be treated.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:38 20 May 2007

Question: What is the Leaky Gut Syndrome (LGS) and how does it cause us harm?

http://www.lifedynamix.com/articles/Ask-Doctor/Leaky_Gut.html

A detailed, easy-to-follow explanation of what leaky gut syndrome is and its various causes, by Dr. James A. Ferrel. It can produce a variety of symptoms that baffle attempts at diagnosis and can lead to labels for depression, bipolar disorder, autism, ADHD, and even psychosis. It can be the underlying factor in auto-immune disorders. This article describes what is going wrong when LGS develops, and how it can be treated. Candida overgrowth can be a factor in LGS (see link above).
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 09:29 20 May 2007

'Diet change cured me of depression'

Campaigners are claiming diets can play a key role in mental health problems.

One man speaks about how he feels cutting out certain foods made a world of difference to his life.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4610998.stm
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 09:37 20 May 2007

Modern diets contain too much omega-6

"Scientists have long suspected that a lack of omega-3 may contribute to depression, but the latest study suggests that an excess of omega-6 - the fatty acid which is more prevalent in the modern diets - may have more to do with it"

http://www.nutraingredients.com/news/ng.asp?id=60253-modern-diet-may
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 09:40 20 May 2007

Researchers Eye Link Between Diet, Depression
Article #1682

by Ned Rozell
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This column is provided as a public service by the Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, in cooperation with the UAF research community. Ned Rozell is a science writer at the institute.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Red salmon, a traditional food high in omega-3 fatty acids. Photo by Ned Rozell.
During the last 50 years, Alaska Natives have eaten fewer seals from the Bering Sea and more steaks from Nebraska. The drastic change in diet that comes with the influence of another culture may be an overlooked factor in mental health problems of northern Natives, according to a team of researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Alaska Natives and other circumpolar people have experienced “a complete change in diet from marine mammals, salmon, eggs from marine birds,” said Abel Bult-Ito, an associate professor of biology with UAF’s Institute of Arctic Biology. “Those have been replaced by steaks and Crisco, you name it. Plus soda--the consumption of those sort of sweetened beverages has skyrocketed.”

Bult-Ito and UAF students Nancy McGrath-Hanna, Dana Green, and Ron Tavernier found what they believe is a connection between diet and mental health when they studied more than 150 journal articles dealing with northern people, diet, depression, and suicide. The International Journal of Circumpolar Health published their summary of those articles in 2003.

Aircraft, barges, roads and other 20th century developments brought non-traditional foods into Native villages. The easy availability of store-bought foods caused an abrupt switch in what people ate.

“These factors have contributed to the replacement of most of the traditional diet with a Western-style diet, which is high in carbohydrates and saturated fats, and low in essential nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids,” the researchers wrote.

Traditional foods high in omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants include fish, seals and other marine mammals, birds and their eggs, fur-bearing animals, and berries. Today, food packaged thousands of miles from village stores has replaced many of the harvested meals that were prevalent for years. When traditional foods were to some extent pushed aside, new diseases appeared.

“Obesity, diabetes, heart disease, mental health problems--from the information we were able to find, Native people didn’t have these problems in the past,” said Bult-Ito. “The sudden shift in diet and lifestyle really hit them hard.”

The UAF researchers mentioned several studies linking depression to lower levels of fish consumption and omega-3 fatty acids. They also pointed out that the suicide rate for Canadian Inuit from 1987 to 1991 was 3.9 times higher than the rate for the rest of Canada. Many researchers have tied suicides to the poor mental health of people suffering from diseases; Bult-Ito and his colleagues suggest that dietary change should be part of the depression equation.

“There’s not a lot you can do about Western culture taking hold, but diet is one thing you might be able to control,” Tavernier said

Some Native communities that remained isolated in Iceland and northern Finland had lower rates of seasonal affective disorder and depression than those more entwined in Western culture, the UAF scientists wrote. They also pointed out that life before Western contact seemed to feature more death due to accidents, but “otherwise, as far as we could tell they were healthier than they are now, on average,” Bult-Ito said.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 21:38 20 May 2007

More about thyroid and depression:

http://www.stopthethyroidmadness.com/thyroid-depression-mental-health/

Explains why T4-only meds don't work. What to get tested, and what DOES work.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 07:56 26 May 2007

http://www.petergillham.com/news.php?include=62418

Doctor Links Diseases to Magnesium Deficiency

Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, and author of "The Miracle of Magnesium" states, “When I was doing research for The Miracle of Magnesium, I found that most if not all of the body's metabolic processes -- those chemical processes which turn food into energy -- require the interaction of various vitamins and minerals in order for them to even work. Many symptoms which trace back to lack of metabolism are caused by either vitamin and mineral deficiency or imbalance. So if medicine continues to focus on drugs to treat symptoms, rather than on possible causes based on deficiencies, they’ll continue to miss the boat on treating a lot of what I think are the 'chronic lifestyle diseases'.

"And beyond that, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has an office called the Office of Dietary Supplements, and at a recent conference I had an opportunity to ask someone in this office about their basic purpose. Their basic goal is to study nutrients for the prevention of disease, not for the treatment of disease. So as long as the government’s focus is just to prevent deficiency diseases by simply providing the required daily allowance (RDA) of nutrients, we’ll never get to the point where we focus on the use of dietary supplements, such as magnesium, for the treatment of today’s common diseases. There are at least twenty-two different diseases and symptoms that I outline in The Miracle of Magnesium for which scientific proof exists of being caused by magnesium deficiency. “The recommended daily allowance (RDA), is about 350 mg per day, but most researchers say you need two and three times that amount, partly because it’s not in foods. If it is in foods, if you cook and process the foods in any way, you lose magnesium.”
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:01 26 May 2007

http://www.petergillham.com/news.php?include=62420

Why MDs Don't Prescribe Magnesium

According to Carolyn Dean, MD, ND, “…there are hundreds of references from medical review journals . I was able to show that many common symptoms for which we really have no drug treatment can be treated by magnesium. “Simple things like angina (chest pain caused by heart problems), muscle spasms, tics, insomnia, migraines—a list of twenty-two conditions. It’s well-known that during pregnancy, if a woman has seizures or hypertension—a condition called preeclampsia -- the treatment is intravenous magnesium. They can’t use drugs for fear of damaging the fetus, so they use something extremely safe and it always works. “But I’ve spoken to heart specialists and asked why they go all the way through the five different types of drugs used for acute heart attack patients, and then as number six give them magnesium. They say, ‘Well, when we finally get to the magnesium, it always works.” But they don’t give it first because it’s really not written up in the medical references. It’s not a drug, so it doesn’t make the “short list”. And when I ask, “Why don’t you use that first?” it’s almost like, “Drugs are powerful, and they’re what doctors give. Doctors don’t give supplements. They’re too common.’ “It’s just not something that even I learned about in medical school, so doctors do not feel comfortable, it seems, prescribing dietary supplements. When they go through six to ten years of medicals school and internships and residencies, they figure if they haven’t learned it in their training, then it doesn’t exist. They do not learn nutrition and they do not learn dietary supplements, and they shy away from them.”


http://www.petergillham.com/news.php?include=62414


Calcium and its Relation to Magnesium

Calcium is an important nutrient essential to maintaining total body health. Your body needs it every day—not just to keep your bones and teeth strong, but to ensure proper functioning of muscles and nerves. It even helps your blood to clot. But can too much calcium be a problem? Yes, it can.

A matter of balance

Calcium deficiency can be a serious issue and has been heavily promoted through the media and advertising. But the hidden cause of calcium deficiency is the fact that available calcium is not being assimilated by the body due to a lack of magnesium.

Without a proper balance of these two minerals, magnesium gets depleted, which will result in the negative effects associated with lack of magnesium and a buildup of unassimilated calcium.

In addition to the many calcium (without magnesium) supplements on the market, calcium is now added to cereals, crackers, juice, antacids and other items (including soft drinks). None of these products contain magnesium to balance the added calcium.

Calcium, Magnesium and Stress

Calcium and magnesium are two different sides of a coin.

Calcium excites nerves while magnesium calms them down.

Calcium makes muscles contract. Magnesium is necessary for muscles to relax.

Calcium is needed for blood clotting but magnesium keeps the blood flowing freely.

It is vital to keep these minerals in balance. Too little magnesium to balance calcium can be both uncomfortable and unhealthy. To ward off the negative effects of a prolonged period of stress or over-reaction to stress, calcium needs to be balanced with adequate amounts of magnesium.

Going through a stressful period without sufficient magnesium can set up a deficit that, if not corrected, can linger, causing more stress (see symptoms of magnesium depletion listed on the green page of this brochure) and further health problems.

Today we have diets dangerously low in magnesium. Add the recent inclusion of nutritional calcium via supplements and food fortifications meant to stave off osteoporosis and many of us are getting inadequate magnesium plus too much calcium.

Women taking calcium supplements to prevent osteoporosis—without adequate magnesium—can actually lower the vital bone mineralization process. Magnesium is as important as calcium in the prevention of osteoporosis and is crucial to increasing bone mass.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 13:39 1 June 2007

http://www.wddty.com/03363800369116480699/food-allergies-made-my-daughter-depressed.html

Food allergies made my daughter depressed
01 June 2003

My 25-year-old daughter was losing weight. Her skin was gray and mottled, and she had a couple of food allergies. She went to her family doctor, who prescribed an ointment for her skin and told her to eat more.

I can’t remember what the ointment the doctor recommended had in it - probably steroids. My daughter was not happy with it and prepared her own antifungal cream. Six months later, I visited my daughter because I thought she was near a nervous breakdown from the way she was behaving with her children - she was feeling so rotten, she could not even smile.

I suggested that she should have acupuncture because I know this is effective for nervous breakdowns. I also found a bioresonance therapist who tests for allergies.

It turned out that my daughter has multiple food intolerances, being allergic to about 10 different foodstuffs as well as to soap and shampoo. Soon after she started on a new diet and food supplements, she started to feel better.

The therapist told me she measures health on a scale of 1 to 25, with 25 being super-healthy. My daughter only scored 11 on this scale at the first visit. A month later, she scored 15, which is an improvement, but she still has a long way to go.

She feels better than she has felt for a long time and can smile again, but her behaviour is still a bit wobbly. Goodness knows what would have happened if she had returned to her family doctor. I imagine she would have been prescribed antidepressants, and her health might have deteriorated to the extent that she would no longer be able to look after her children.

It makes me wonder how many people there are out there being treated with antidepressants or classified as having nervous breakdowns when they are really just allergic to foods. - P. Knox, Holyhead
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 08:11 6 June 2007

How "Modern Medicine" Killed my Brother

by Russell Blaylock, M.D.

Earlier this month, I traveled to Monroe, La., to bury my dear older brother, Charles. Charles was not only a wonderful brother, but he was a man with a heart of gold who always put the needs of others and his family before his own. Charles, unfortunately, began smoking when he was in law school, something I warned him about repeatedly.

Approximately four months ago, I noticed that he was getting hoarse. He brushed it off and continued his hectic schedule. When I again visited him a month later, he was still having the hoarseness. I advised him to see someone about it. He took my advice and saw a local physician group. The doctor was actually too busy to see him and had his nurse see him.

Before he went to the doctor, I told him it was critical that he have the doctor examine his vocal cords. The nurse looked in his throat, but wasn't trained to examine his vocal cords.

Two more weeks passed during which his doctors assured him that it was nothing more than bronchitis. They treated him with steroids and antibiotics, but no one examined his vocal cords.

Misdiagnosis After Misdiagnosis

I pleaded with him to see an Ear, Nose and Throat doctor, but he trusted his doctor. For the next two and a half months, he was treated with steroids and antibiotics. Finally, he developed pneumonia and was admitted to the hospital, what was supposed to be one of the best hospitals in the area.

At the time, I was on vacation in North Carolina. He told me the doctors told him he had a bruit in his carotid artery, a sign of atherosclerosis, and that they wanted to do an arteriogram. I advised him against it, suspecting he, in fact, had a cancer and attempting an arteriogram on someone with such poor pulmonary function would be disastrous. The arteriogram was cancelled. Still, no one had examined his vocal cords.

When I arrived, I called a friend of mine I had gone to medical school with, and asked him to see Charles. Prior to this, I asked the doctor in charge of his respiratory care to add vitamins and magnesium to his IV. While he promised he would, he didn't. Every attempt to get Charles' laboratory studies was met with obstruction based on the Patient Privacy Act. He soon signed the necessary forms and finally I was able to see this closely guarded data.

When I asked his doctor why the magnesium had not been added to his IV, word was sent back to me through the nurse that she had never heard of using magnesium. I sent copies of selected articles showing the immense value of magnesium on pulmonary and cardiovascular function. Still there was no response from the doctor. Not once did this doctor call me, or answer my pages.

Finally, The Diagnosis is Made


My ENT friend did a very good workup and discovered Charles had a large cancer in his left lower lung that was impinging on the nerve to his vocal cord, causing one cord to be completely paralyzed. At that point, a pulmonary physician did a bronchial biopsy and diagnosed a poorly differentiated lung cancer, with no evidence of spread. Once the diagnosis was made, an oncologist was naturally called, who wanted to start a complete course of chemotherapy drugs.

I advised my brother against it, knowing the cancer would not respond and the toxic drugs would dramatically increase his breathing difficulties, hastening his death. He took my advice. Then, a radiation oncologist suggested radiating the tumor to shrink it. I wasn't supportive of this treatment, but my brother wanted something done.

Soon afterward, he started five and a half weeks of radiation treatment. At that point, I started him on a nutrition program and he began to feel better, his breathing improved and he was able to go back to work.

However, the oncologist told Charles he was losing too much weight and he needed to eat more bread, pasta and even sweets to gain weight. Charles, at the time of his diagnosis, was grossly overweight and needed to lose the weight. I told him that losing the weight would make it easier for him to breath. I had given him a copy of my book on the nutritional treatment of cancer and told him it was critical he follow the advice exactly.

Unfortunately, Charles decided he didn't like the taste of the blenderized vegetables and would do what the oncologist suggested. He began to eat ice cream, cookies and other items that cancer patients should never eat. Once he finished the radiation treatments, he developed fever, severe shortness of breath and had to be admitted to the hospital.

The "Evidence Based" Physicians Take Over

Sadly, he chose a hospital that was even more rigid in its control of the patient than his previous hospital. It was a local hospital affiliated with the Louisiana State University Medical Center. Charles was admitted to the intensive care unit, where he had to be intubated and placed on a respirator.

Again, I was out of town, in fact, giving a talk at the Westin Price Conference in Washington, D.C., on nutrition. As before, I could not pry any information about my brother concerning his laboratory test, chest x-rays or the reason he was deteriorating so rapidly. His doctor refused to call me, despite numerous attempts by my sister and me to have her call.

In all my 26 years of neurosurgical practice, I have never seen a situation where a doctor treating a gravely ill patient would not discuss the case with a family member who is a physician. It was as if my brother belonged to the hospital and his physician and the family was to be kept in the dark.

Finally, I was able to speak to one of the consulting doctors, who told me my brother had a very low hemoglobin count. I asked him if he was giving him blood.

After a long pause, he answered, "No." I responded, " Well, with him unable to breath, don't you think it would be a good idea to increase his oxygen-carrying capacity by giving him blood?" He mumbled in agreement. I told him that I wanted my sister and her son to give the blood and that they were in the process of doing that as we spoke. He agreed. Yet, before my sister could have the blood transferred to Charles, the doctors had already given him blood from unknown donors.

I rushed to my brother's side and found him awake, on a respirator and very frightened. He was receiving no magnesium in his IV and was getting a tube feeding-formula that contains significant doses of glutamate, something known to cause pulmonary deterioration. Again, his doctor never heard of that.

An Incredible Admission

At that point, Charles was lapsing into a coma. Still his doctor had not contacted me or communicated with me in any way. Disgusted, I told the nurse to have her come to the room and I didn't want any excuses. I asked to speak to her in private. She insisted a nurse remain with her. I told her of my absolute amazement that a treating physician would not speak to the family, especially when one of the family members was a doctor. She denied she had ever gotten a message, which was a bold-faced lie.

I then told her that I wanted my brother to have certain supplements that had been shown in careful medical studies to improve lung function. She had never heard of them, but agreed to give them if her superior, the Chief of Medicine, agreed. Therefore, I gave her a stack of medical abstracts and told her to let me know if there was a problem.

Within five minutes, she returned and stated that he would not agree to it and responded that the Chief of Medicine told her that he would not agree to change the treatment based on abstracts. I told her I wanted to talk with him that minute.

He arrived, looking very arrogant and self-important. I decided that I would try to calmly discuss with him my brother's case and why he needed the supplements. Again, I asked for a private meeting. He wanted Charles' doctor to be present.

I explained to him what I was asking for was backed up by peer-reviewed studies and that none of the supplements had ever shown any harmful side effects in any dose. In a very arrogant tone, totally unsympathetic to my concern for my brother, he stated that he only read and trusted four journals:

Lancet
New England Journal of Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine
Journal of the American Medical Association
Shocked that anyone would admit to being so intellectually limited, I told him there were thousands of peer-reviewed medical journals, most of which were reputable. He responded that he didn't have time to read or look up additional material.

What an admission!

I reminded him I practiced neurosurgery for 26 years and was a hell of a lot busier than he had ever been. I also told him I had managed to write three books and 30 articles for peer-reviewed journals in addition to three chapters for medical textbooks. He had no comment.

I told him I found it inconceivable that a physician holding the position of Chief of Staff in a teaching hospital would:

Admit they read only four journals
Didn't have time to research material that would improve a patient's care
Would be so obstinate and filled with so much self-importance they would allow a patient to die rather than try something that had strong clinical evidence of benefit without any complications
The doctor still refused to change his mind.

I pointed out to him, for 20 years there was a mountain of evidence that magnesium offered tremendous protection to the heart and brain, but because of people like him, it was only recently that magnesium has been added to the "protocol" for heart patients. I, then, reminded both of them that tens of thousands of patients died during that 20-year period because of their unwillingness to use a harmless mineral like magnesium. Then I said, " Is my brother to die because of your narrow mindedness and arrogance"?

I pointedly asked him if he could see the logic, the reasoning behind what I was asking. He responded that he did up until to the point about all the people that must die because of waiting for the elite of medicine to make up their mind. I turned to the female physician and asked her the same question. She said she agreed with the logic but trusted her chief.

Blind Leading the Blind

I asked the Chief of Medicine if he would want the same treatment for his brother. He thought a minute and then said, "Yes." He again, appealed to the fact that he didn't have time to research all these things. I reminded him that his job was to do whatever was necessary to provide his patients with the best medical care, based on the latest medical evidence available no matter how much time he had to sacrifice. He could not fall back on time constraints or the fact that he trusted only four journals.

The Chief of Medicine left, a lot less openly arrogant and self-assured. He was not able to give a single argument to support his intellectually bankrupt concept of medicine.

It reminded me of the title of a book I had recently purchased: Intellectual Morons. He certainly fit the description. Before he left, I reminded him it was doctors like him who were the problem in modern medicine -- arrogant, condescending to patients and certain the medical care protocols established by the elitist academians were holy writ. Further, it was because of such an attitude that patients by the millions were leaving the medical care system, and seeking answers from so-called alternative medicine.

Patients were fed up with having drugs and treatments shoved down their throats that only led to more misery and rarely helped their disease.

The Danger of Regimentation

The practice of medicine has changed drastically in the world, especially in this country. When I first entered the world of medicine, doctors were able to practice independently, always maintaining a close relationship between themselves, the patient and the patient's family. Creative, caring doctors could alter their care to match new developments in medicine and nutrition to the greatest benefit of their patients. Third parties such as insurance companies, government and medical elite were held at bay.

Yet, the new thinking is that the practicing physician, and especially the patient, is unable to make these decisions. Instead, they are to follow a system of regimented medicine that assigns treatment protocols the physician is to blindly follow.

Elite boards appointed by medical associations, such as the American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Practice and others, design these treatment protocols and hand them down to the "ignorant automatons" making up the vast majority of treating physicians. They are to follow these regimented treatments without question and to the letter.

The new breed of doctor, like my brother's doctors, fits this new pattern well. They are convinced this "cookbook" medicine is superior and their elite journals and medical associations know best. Like members of the society Aldous Huxley described in A Brave New World, they are mere cogs in the wheel of the state's machinery. They do not question the authorities or the wisdom of their decrees. They do what they are told. They are unable to think for themselves.

In fact, I asked Charles' doctor, "Can you not think for yourself?" She looked at me sheepishly and said, "I just trust the Chief of Medicine."

I also reminded the arrogant Chief of Medicine these elite decision-making bodies have been racked with scandals that involved financial connections to pharmaceutical companies and other medical product manufacturers. In addition, similar scandals occurred among the editorial staff of one of his favorite journals, the New England Journal of Medicine.

This collectivist regimentation of medicine will only get worse. Families are now excluded from medical care decisions, doctors do not talk to families, the entire hospital experience is shrouded in secrecy and patients have no say in their care. While more innovative doctors can alter the protocols or even reject them, soon they will not have that option. To deviate from the collectivist plan is to invite the wrath of the legal system.

Fear of Financial Ruin

Litigation pushes many physicians into following elitist protocols out of fear of financial ruin. In fact, these protocols have become the "standard of care" used by the legal system. Unfortunately, doctors, like those who killed my brother, are being turned out of medical schools all over the country like robots. They repeat the mantra of collectivism as if they thought of it themselves. To this new breed of doctors, individualism and independent thought is to be discouraged and reviled. Dependence on elite leaders will be automatic.

As an example, I recently spoke to a large group concerning the harmful effects of glutamate, explaining it is now known that glutamate, as added to foods, significantly accelerates the growth and spread of cancers. I asked the crowd when was the last time an oncologist told his or her patient to avoid MSG or foods high in glutamate. The answer, I said, was never.

After the talk, a crowd gathered to ask more questions. Suddenly, I was interrupted by a young woman who identified herself as a radiation oncologist. She angrily stated, "I really took offense to your comment about oncologists not telling their patients about glutamate."

I turned to her and asked, "Well, do you tell your patients to avoid glutamate?" She looked puzzled and said, "No one told us to." I asked her who this person or persons were whose job it was to provide her with this information. I, then, reminded her that I obtained this information from her oncology journals. Did she not read her own journals?

Yet, this is the attitude of the modern doctor. An elitist group is in charge of disseminating all the information physicians are to know. If they do not tell them, then, in their way of thinking, the information was of no value. Of course, 10 or 20 years from now, it may be the new standard and on all the protocols.

How many cancer patients will have died during the long wait for the elitists to conclude the information was important? A million? Five million? Do they even care?

In my conversation with the two physicians responsible for my brother's "care," they obviously didn't care.

It is too late for my brother. But, maybe, just maybe, if enough people decide they do not care to leave their fate and that of their loved ones in the hands of these arrogant regimented physicians, something will change.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 10:38 15 July 2007

Thyroid Hormone Helps "Winter Blues" (SAD)

The few souls who brave Antarctic weather may offer clues on treating wintertime blues in more temperate and populated spots on the planet. Researchers have found that treatment with thyroid hormone improves the dulled mental skills and bad moods that are part of Antarctic life.


Thyroid hormones help orchestrate the body's metabolism. When the concentration of thyroid hormone in the blood dips too low, metabolism slows and symptoms such as fatigue, poor memory, weight gain and depression set in. The condition, called hypothyroidism, is treated with thyroid hormone.


Since Antarctic living can produce a similar condition called polar T3 syndrome, investigators looked at whether thyroid hormone might be useful in the South Pole.


The findings suggest thyroid hormone may combat the "winter depression" that affects people living in more temperate climates.

Researchers followed 12 individuals over a year in Antarctica. The team found that during the first 4 months, the study participants' thyroid hormone levels dipped, along with their moods and performance on tests of mental skills and exercise capacity. Their body temperatures had also declined.


Over the next 7 months, half of the participants took daily doses of thyroid hormone. By the end of the study, their scores on mental skills tests had risen and so had their moods.


Researchers believe that living in Antarctica causes the muscles to hoard thyroid hormone in order to warm the body, at the expense of the brain. When they gave the individuals thyroid hormone, it may have been shuttled to the brain, where it was most needed. Thus, the improvement in mood and mental skills, but not exercise performance.


Thyroid fluctuations have also been found in temperate climates during winter. This study suggests thyroid supplements should be studied as a way to combat seasonal affective disorder, a wintertime depression marked by fatigue, mood swings and concentration problems.


The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism January 2001;86:110-116

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Mercola's Comment:

The researchers, like most traditional physicians used synthetic thyroid hormones in their study. They would have achieved far better results had they used desiccated whole thyroid preparations like Armour thyroid.

The study does provide some powerful evidence that those taking thyroid hormones will need higher doses in the winter months than they do in the summer.

Lack of sunlight has been shown to affect levels of vitamin D and melatonin, so it could be that this may be related to the decreased thyroid levels as well. That is why it is important to take vitamin D supplements during the winter months. Carlson's cod liver oil is now one of my favorite sources.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 17:40 8 September 2007

Another thing that might be worth considering is mercury toxicity. This can come from dental amalgams and vaccines, among other things.

I had my 4 amalgams removed 2 1/2 months ago and have done several rounds of chelation since. I have noticed a definite positive difference in my symptoms.

I also talk on a good mercury/amalgam forum which is quite a busy place. I've met others there who have experienced SAD-like symptoms and some who used to think, like me, that SAD was their main problem.

Mercury is known to interfere with thyroid function and melatonin production. The hypothalamus is one of the main areas of the brain that mercury seems to target. It goes right through the jaw where the amalgams are.

Not everyone who has fillings experiences mercury toxicity. Some people are better at eliminating it than others. Most doctors and dentists still deny that amalgams are a problem but there is growing evidence that chronic low-level mercury exposure can be implicated in all kinds of health problems, from depression to ME.

If you have a mouthful of fillings and are troubled by SAD, I would suggest considering amalgam removal by a dentist who will follow safe removal protocols. It's another potential strategy to add to the arsenal.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 07:41 11 November 2007

Some good alt med and nutrition sites:

Dr. Mercola
http://www.mercola.com/index.htm

Weston A. Price Foundation
http://www.westonaprice.org/splash_2.htm

Doctor Yourself, by Dr. Andrew Saul
http://www.doctoryourself.com/

Shirley's Wellness Cafe
http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/philo1.htm#healingcrisis

UK Naturopathic News
http://www.naturopathy-uk.com/news/news-articles/

NewsTarget Health News
http://www.newstarget.com/

Orthomolecular.org
http://www.orthomolecular.org/

Patrick Holford
http://www.patrickholford.com/content.asp?id_Content=1

Gary Null
http://www.garynull.com/

The Vitamin C Fountation
http://www.vitamincfoundation.org/

Life Extension
http://www.lef.org/

Sorry, looks like you'll have to cut-and-paste to use these. Links still aren't working on this new forum format.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 07:46 11 November 2007

Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 14:38 11 November 2007

Nutrition
by Dr. Barry Durrant-Peatfield and Nikki Tovell, UK thyroid specialists

Nutrition. What do you think of when you see that word ? For most people, "nutrition" conjures up some vague ideas about eating a balanced diet comprising something of each of the four main food groups, and maybe sticking to low-fat, low-sugar, low-salt foods. "Eating Healthily" is commonly associated with lettuce leaves and raw carrots - rabbit food, to most people. But nutrition isn't so much about what we eat, as what our bodies do with the foods we eat.

Linus Pauling, Nobel Prize winner for chemistry, and widely considered to be the father of molecular biology, stated that "the use of nutritional supplements, in the treatment as well as the prevention of disease, is clearly the future of medicine." What he meant by that was that every single degenerative disease and every single case of "natural death" in humans can be traced to a nutritional deficiency. This apparently controversial statement is borne out by extensive amounts of research done in this field; research papers, clinical trials, double blind trials, and scientific evidence beyond dispute all demonstrate quite categorically that this is indeed the truth. In the early 1970's Dr Joel Wallach, reknowned nutritionalist, medical doctor, and former veterinary surgeon, found it to be true after spending twelve years completing 17,500 autopsies on more than 454 different species of animals for American zoos, and more than 3,000 autopsies on humans. Literally thousands upon thousands of articles, papers and books have been published confirming the scientific validity of this theory. Inadequate nutrition causes disease and death. It's a scientific fact. And yet orthodox doctors will disagree most vehemently. This is simply because they are not taught about this in medical school.

What they are taught in medical school is that disease is an invader to be beaten off with the big sticks of pharmaceutical drugs and surgery. What we teach at Foxley Lane is that disease is a sign of an imbalance in the body, and can be rectified without necessarily bombarding an already weakened system with heavy drugs or surgery. Full and active health can be restored and maintained simply by providing the body with the basic tools it needs to achieve this. This means that we have to look at the body as a whole, and not at individual systems in isolation from each other. Everything within the body is designed to work in harmony with the other parts, and if one part is not working optimally it will naturally have a knock-on effect on other parts. Some of you will be aware of this already; low back pain can lead to headaches, a bad hip can lead to back pain, PMS leads to mood swings and depression, and so on. The majority of degenerative illnesses (arthritis, fibromyalgia, rheumatism, heart conditions, diabetes, osteoporosis, multiple allergies, etc etc) are linked to hypometabolic disorders, and those of you with hypothyroidism or hypoadrenalism will be only too familiar with the enormous range and ferocity of symptoms that these conditions can bring about. Yet if you go to an orthodox doctor, they will try to treat all the symptoms individually, never once addressing the underlying cause. And of course, you never really feel well, despite the amount of pain killers, diuretics, antifungals, antibiotics, antihistamines or other drugs you are taking to relieve your myriad of symptoms. Hardly seems fair, does it ?


Metabolism is the term used to describe the rate at which your body performs each and every one of it's billions and billions of functions. At it's most basic, it can be described as energy. If you have low energy, you have a low, or hypoactive, metabolism; if you have excessive energy, you have a hyper or overactive metabolism. Humans are no different from any other living organism in that they must ingest certain substances to provide this energy; plants pull minerals from the soil, animals eat plants and other animals. Even viruses and bacteria "feed", on whichever human, plant or animal they are currently hitching a ride on. No form of life exists without getting nutrition suitable to its' needs. Any gardeners out there will be familiar with the fact that alkaline-loving plants do badly in acid soil, and vice versa. Any dog owners will know that you can't really give your hound cattle feed and expect him to do well on it.

Studies show that humans need no fewer than NINETY-ONE nutrients every day in order to meet your body's essential needs. Please note the use of the word "essential" - there are other nutrients which can further improve health. This is merely the very basic number needed to exist at a functional level. These are:

SIXTY minerals, SIXTEEN vitamins, TWELVE amino acids, and THREE essential fatty acids.

And this, of course, assumes that you have good health to begin with. If you have any history of ill- health whatsoever, you will be deficient in some of these nutrients. Chronic ill-health causes all sorts of problems of absorption too, so even if you think you are taking in the right amounts of all these ninety-one nutrients, there's a high probability that you won't actually be utilising them and will therefore still be deficient. It isn't enough to be putting the right things in - you need to be absorbing and using them too.

Faerie9
Faerie9
joined 13 Nov 2007
54 posts

send a pm

Posted by Faerie9, 12:07 20 November 2007

This is a fascinating topic. I have to confess I skimmed much of it, but I have long thought that diet is so essential to health. I'm convinced that the prevalence of many diseases and ills in modern western society can be directly attributable to the cr@p we put into our bodies. It isn't the only reason, for sure, but it is a significant factor.

It's easy to say that, and much more difficult to act on it. I don't believe nutrition can replace drugs - though in my case various lifestyle changes certainly delayed the need to be put on antidepressants. And then for many months they were an amazing addition to my life. I'm now hacked off with them but that's another story.

I'm very concerned about what I eat, and am a big carb-fan (but healthy ones! Potatoes! Pasta! Rice! Fill you up and good for you! Or not, apparently!!). I may experiment with cutting out big carbs.

My main problem is time. I dislike cooking, and my nearest shop is 5 miles away which means shopping for fresh veg is very difficult. I need recipes and ideas - I have no imagination where cookery is concerned!

I believe in holistic practises: Western medicine yes, treats the symptoms without looking at the whole picture in many cases. If you eat rubbish, you will more than likely have problems, whether you notice them or not. I never find it easy to act on my beliefs though.

I'm rambling now...

Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 21:04 20 November 2007

You might find some confidence by looking around at groups that do the Paleolithic diet. I'd also very highly recommed the sites I posted above. Mercola is probably a good place to start and browse.

Eating a wholefoods diet does require some more time in the kitchen, but I find it is time well-spent; and there are all sorts of time-saving ploys you can use. A lot of people like to fill a crock pot with meat and veg, which will be ready by the time they get home from work. You can also make big batches of things and freeze portions.

Paleo and supplements helped me to feel a lot better. They cure many people completely. If you know enough about what you are doing, and have the help of a good ND, then there's very little that this approach won't help with. Drugs really aren't necessary in the vast majority of cases; though they become a necessity when people do not take responsibility for their health and want a pill to put everything right. Sometimes what's also lacking is knowledge about alternatives. If I'd known what I know now, there's no way I would ever have taken an antidepressant -- but that knowledge only came about through that experience.

I think mercury might be part of my own problem now. Like I said, problems can have a myriad of causes. I got 4 amalgam fillings put in after having had none, and 2 months later the depression began. Amalgam removal is usually not the first thing people think of in this kind of situation, and it took me a long time to get there myself, but I did eventually. I had very noticeable symptoms when they were removed, and I have similar lower-level symptoms when I chelate, so I think I'm probably onto something here. Unfortunately it's going to take time. Healing does. It's too quick and easy to get messed up in the first place.

It really is important, I feel, to keep looking for answers. Why "survive" winter after winter if an actual cure can be effected. My ND told me a year ago that people with true SAD are helped a great deal by a light box; if there are still troublesome symptoms when it is used, then the problem is not SAD alone. Once you have a label, though, it can be easy to say "this is my problem" and leave it at that -- stop exploring other possibilities. If the light box and visors had worked for me the way I wanted them to, I never would have looked beyond them myself. The same probably goes for the medication.

I hope you can find something here to help you :) I started this topic about a year ago but I try to add a little here and there if I see some good info or advice. I wish someone could have told me these things when I first became ill, but sometimes knowledge is hard-earned.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 10:46 4 December 2007

A basic nutritional healing regime.

Nutritious diet -- see posts toward the beginning of this thread.

Supplements. It's ideal to visit a naturopath and get a specific regime prescribed for you, ideally with some testing of which deficiencies you have, and what toxins may be in your system. But a very general healing regime is this:

A high-quality multivitamin with all the B-vitamins in high amounts

Vitamin C, at least 3g per day, in divided doses

Fish oil (for omega-3)

Magnesium citrate, malate, chelate, or taurate, 800mg per day, in divided doses

Calcium, 400mg per day, in divided doses. Do not take with magnesium as calcium interferes with its absorption.

Other things you can look at: A colloidal mineral supplement. Vitamin D3. Vitamin E (d-alpha tocopherol with mixed tocopherols, or gamma tocopherol if available).

There are many other possibilities, depending on your needs (i.e.whether your immune system is compromised, whether you are deficient in a particular nutrient, whether you are healing from drug damage, doing chelation, etc). There are also many herbs with healing powers, and other things that help too like homeopathy, traditional Chinese medicine, and Bach Flower Essences. These can all be very useful, though make sure you research what you are doing carefully before you try, and get the help of an expert if you can.

I firmly believe this: it is a very rare condition that cannot be treated with these methods, coupled with addressing one's life issues and learning techniques like relaxation and meditation. The mind and the body can almost always heal themselves, given the right support from their caretaker.

One day I hope this will all be part of mainstream medicine, and available on the NHS. In the meantime it's up to us to take responsibility for our health and learn what our doctors don't know. My own GP says he used traditional Chinese medicine to cure his asthma, so maybe there's hope :)
IrishMark
joined 27 Dec 2007
6 posts

send a pm

Posted by IrishMark, 18:33 29 December 2007

I am unsure of your villifying of potatoes. I am not questioning you or your sources of this information, but like my countrymen for generations (I live in ireland)i live on potatoes and it is damn nigh impossible not to eat them- are they really that bad?
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 10:31 30 December 2007

You might have heard of something called the glycemic index. Potatoes are a very high glycemic index food. They are also often prepared in unhealthy ways, e.g. frying in vegetable oil.

Having said that, what matters is one's overall state of health. If the rest of your diet is great, you are emotionally and physically healthy, and you exercise, then probably you don't need to worry about the odd less-than-healthy food you eat. I doubt that many people on this forum meet that description or they wouldn't be here.

I understand how hard it can be to change one's diet when there are particular foods that are loved or that are difficult to avoid. My suggestion is simply that if you're interested in this, do a little homework and find out what benefits changing your diet can bring, and hopefully then you will feel like you are empowering, rather than depriving, yourself. I think the mercola site www.mercola.com is a great place to start if you are looking for nutritional info.

Hope this helps,
Linda.
Sticky Glitter Hands
joined 7 Jan 2008
8 posts

send a pm

Posted by Sticky Glitter Hands, 12:48 7 January 2008

Wow. Hi, I'm new, I joined this morning. I came here searching, as ever, for answers to questions tht doctors don't seem to quite understand.

I've long known that certain food additives make me...well... unpleasant to be around. I self-dx'd SAD and got myself a lamp which I use at work. I also self-diagnosed and treated Candida last year.

Reading this forum, and this thread in particular seems to make so much sense.

*is off to read more*
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 18:01 7 January 2008

I hope you've found some info here that is helpful to you.

Just a thought, but could amalgams be part of the problem? I also talk on a mercury forum and depression, chemical sensitivities and candida are all common signs of chronic mercury poisoning. They may of course be completely unrelated, but it's another avenue to possibly consider.

Take care and I'm always happy to chat.
Sticky Glitter Hands
joined 7 Jan 2008
8 posts

send a pm

Posted by Sticky Glitter Hands, 07:42 8 January 2008

Hi :)

I have often wondered... I did loads of research a couple of years back, but my Hubby thought I was totally barking mad for suggesting it, and the dentist won't remove them anyway on the NHS so if it is a contributing factor, I'm stuck with 'em!

It all made sense to me... I went for a filling and was in pretty much constant pain for months and months because the week after I had the filling I became pregnant and wouldn't risk having any treatment. DD was a few months old when it all got too much and I made an appointment for the dentist..... it turned out that the filling which had been done had been "a big one" and had cracked - probably before the anaesthetic wore off on the day - which is why the after-pain never really went away and indeed got worse and worse.

I was then butchered (I kid you not!!!) by the dentist and ended up eventually having to have the new filling out and a gold one put in. It's been nothing but trouble ever since *sigh*

I can usually taste metal or "something funny" in my mouth. But, as I say, they won't remove amalgam fillings on the NHS, and we really can't afford to have it done privately... so I'm stuck with 'em.

I suppose I need to research what I can do to "de-tox" really by myself.....

If it is a contributing factor, I don't think it's the "whole problem"....there's other stuff too. I'm just a bit barmy, sometimes ;o) :oD
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 07:31 9 January 2008

It sounds more likely, from what you say, that mercury from amalgams could be your problem. Mercury has an affinity for the brain and unless you take something to chelate it out, it will stay there. This can certainly happen with a cracked and leaking filling. What's more, the metallic taste is also a strong indicator.

I looked into seeing a biological dentist, who will take the necessary precautions when removing amalgams, but it was very costly. So I decided to take a risk by paying to have them out without precautions, by my usual dentist. In the short term it may have saved money, but in the long term it's going to take me more time to get better and it's going to cost more in chelating agents, because of the added mercury exposure from that removal.

Sometimes we simply can't put a price on our health. If your symptoms worsen over time, you might wonder if it was worth doing something about the amalgams previously. I've seen some very ill people on the forum I belong to.

Just a word of warning -- trying to chelate while you still have amalgams is dangerous and could cause your body to absorb even more mercury. It needs to be done once the amalgams are gone.

If you're interested in pursuing this, this is a very good forum where you can introduce yourself and ask for advice and support: http://herballure.com/ubbthreads/postlist.php?Cat=&Board=UBB19&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=

Hope this helps :)
Linda.
Sticky Glitter Hands
joined 7 Jan 2008
8 posts

send a pm

Posted by Sticky Glitter Hands, 07:34 9 January 2008

Thanks, I will have a think about that one :)
Cathy
joined 30 Jan 2008
10 posts

send a pm

Posted by Cathy, 15:21 30 January 2008

Hi Linda:
I too, have been working with a naturopath and have changed my diet dramatically (quite similar to yours). Do you still find you need to use a lighbox to help with your SAD, or has nutrition completely taken care of it. Thanks. (I'm definitely still having problems with SAD, even with the diet changes).
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 20:37 31 January 2008

It's been a roller-coaster ride for me Cathy. What I've found along the way is that many people can help but none of them have all the answers, and sometimes they get it wrong. My ND helped me out a great deal with coming off the drugs and sorting out my diet and supplements -- all of those things are what she specialises in -- but I believe I have other issues that she knows little about, such as mercury toxicity and possible hypothyroidism, and unfortunately I held out for a long time in thinking that nutrition alone could heal me and stopped in my search for answers. Nutrition is vitally important in health and healing, and it is all many people need in order to heal, but often other factors can be involved. Lack of nutrition is one cause of illness; toxicity is another, and I believe it's more common than most people realise -- there are so many sources in the modern Western world.

SAD was the first explanation of my problem that I considered. I zapped myself for hours with light therapy. It helped a bit but not a lot, and I still kept going downhill in the winters (better in the summers but by no means healthy). My ND says that if light therapy doesn't alleviate the problem to a large extent, the problem isn't pure SAD.

As I said in the AD thread, it would be helpful to know more about your history before I go any further in this discussion, because if I generalised I could be completely off base. It would also be helpful to know what your ND's diagnosis is and what he/she has suggested for treatment.

I can't promise I have answers, but I think we could at least draw some logical conclusions about productive lines of investigation, based on your medical history and symptoms. I can also say this -- that if you are prepared to make any necessary changes in your life in order to get well, and to take responsibility for your own healing, then with perseverence it is very likely that you will find your way back to health. I know others who have done it, I'm doing it, and I'm sure you can too :)
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 17:19 10 February 2008

Eating Your Way Through the Winter Blahs

from Caring Nutrition, Illinois

http://caringnutrition.com/are_you_sad.htm

Have you noticed that people are getting a little crankier these days? Are you waking up in the mornings wishing you lived on a tropical island with palm trees swaying in the breeze? Is the cold and dreariness getting you down? Eating right help you tackle a cold, long, winter.

What should you do? Don't just resolve to hibernate, waiting for the warm weather to return.

Instead, try some of these simple ways to help chase away the winter blahs. A case of the winter blues is not the same as the condition called Seasonal Affective Disorder, or SAD, but they tend to have similar symptoms.

Approximately 10 million Americans suffer from SAD, with symptoms including severe depression and fatigue. This depressive disorder is due, in part, to a lack of bright sunshine. Lights that help simulate that bright light are available and many people find that this helps a lot. But what else is contributing? Let’s take a look at what you’re eating.

Food: Breakfast is the most important meal of the day. Start out the day with a meal that contains some protein and low in simple carbohydrates and sugar, but high in complex carbohydrates, such as whole grains. This will help you achieve peak mental performance during the day.

Caffeine can improve mental alertness but limit its use to prevent addiction. It can leave you with unpleasant withdrawal symptoms such as stress, anxiety and irritability, and can be detrimental to overall health. We are not saying that you should not consume ANY caffeine, just don’t become addicted to it. Speaking of caffeine – we want to let you know that we do not recommend decaffeinated coffee/tea. The decaffeination process adds more chemical to the products and can actually lead to a whole slue of other problems, one of them rheumatoid arthritis.

If you eat a significant amount of carbohydrates and/or caffeine and sugar, you may be suffering from hypoglycemia, which could be contributing to your “blue” feeling. The fluctuating high and low swings in blood sugar in this condition can produce anxiety, depression, irritability, and a sense of loss of control. The condition is very common. Targeted nutritional supplementation and dietary modifications can stop the Jekyll-Hyde like transformations.

The sugar connection:
We find in our patients at Caring Medical that most of the problems feeling blue or melancholy are related to the brain not getting enough or the appropriate energy. Without enough energy, the body feels irritable, fatigued, and the person is unable to concentrate.

Why does this happen? In 8/10 cases that we see here at the clinic, the cause is related to low blood sugar. Some people can eat one time per day and feel good. But the average person must eat throughout the day. One huge meal per day is not a good way to eat. The person will begin the day with a very low blood sugar level. This fasting state will not be broken until the “fast” is broken with a meal. In the meantime, the person is suffering from the effects of low blood sugar. When the person eats, it produces a fast rise in blood sugar, with a resultant DROP after the meal. We all know what this feels like having eaten like this at Thanksgiving! Bottom line: Reduce simple carbohydrates, increase protein and good fats, and eat breakfast.

If you are female, and you notice that your symptoms cycle with the menstrual period, you should get hormone testing. Cycle related imbalances are easily and safely corrected with identical to natural hormones. Simple dietary maneuvers can also make a big difference. For women, progesterone is a calming hormone. Women with low progesterone levels are prone to agitation and irritability. Women who also have high testosterone levels are also prone to irritability as well. It is very beneficial to get your hormones checked for this reason. This can be especially problematic for a woman who is just starting to undergo menopause.

It is not unusual for us to see women RUN into our office in a panic who are overcome with sudden anxiety and memory loss. Come to find out, they have just begun the process of menopause and have experienced sudden drops in hormone levels that are producing these symptoms. These can be alleviated with natural hormone replacement therapy. Sometimes we see this kind of response worsened by the continuation of a bleak and dreary winter season.

Men, on the other hand, are energized by testosterone. However, if their levels of testosterone are high, and they have no “outlet” such as physical activity, exercise, sex with their spouse, etc., then they can experience severe mood problems, such as anxiety, irritability, and depression. Low levels of testosterone can also lead to lethargy, listlessness, inactivity, and resultant obesity. Again, it is important to get the levels checked.

Low cortisol levels (stress hormone) can also cause inability to handle stress well, which can definitely affect one’s mood. They may cry easily, feel depressed, and are filled with anxiety.

Feelings of depression may be due to growth hormone, sex hormone, or adrenal hormone deficiencies or vitamin and mineral imbalances, especially B12 deficiency attributed to inadequate dietary intake and failing digestive and absorptive functions. Sometimes our bodies require a little digestive support with digestive enzymes to help us better assimilate the foods that we eat.

The needs of the brain may help neurons to achieve the most desirable chemical balance naturally. The brain being a hungry organ depends first of all on a healthy liver and gastrointestinal tract to use food well: to properly absorb nutrients and deliver them to the brain, to remove toxins and to maintain proper immune system activity.

Fat: Because the brain cells are largely composed of fat, the right kinds of fat in the diet are one of the most critical elements in creating and maintaining brain health.

The same precious omega 3 fatty acids that promote healthy hearts can also help our brain and mood. Primary sources of those health-giving fats are fatty cold-water fish including salmon, mackerel, anchovies, sardines, herring and Atlantic sturgeon.

Eat fish a minimum of three times per week if you can. If you just can’t manage that, try taking a fish oil supplement. Canola, olive and flax are good plant sources of Omega-3 fatty acids, along with flax seeds, which can also be ground and added to foods are also a good source.

The B-complex vitamins work in chorus to promote brain and immune system health by protecting nerve tissue against oxidation, enhancing memory, mood, and insulating nerve cells. Your body requires B vitamins to produce many neurotransmitters. Besides meat, there are many good vegetarian sources of B vitamins, including whole grain pasta, grains, rice, wheat germ and nuts.

Anti-oxidants: Because the brain in made up largely of fatty acids, it is susceptible to oxidation damage caused by free radicals - highly reactive molecules that attack and damage cell membranes, protein and even our genetic code - and in doing so bring about age and disease. So if you have been “super-sizing it” all winter on fast food products, now is the time to change!

Antioxidants are nutrients which combat and neutralize free radicals. The primary weapons in this ongoing fight are vitamins C and E, carotenoids and the mineral selenium. Many foods are rich sources of antioxidants. Carotenoids are found in dark orange and dark green leafy vegetable, such as carrots, sweet potatoes, kale and spinach. Vitamin C is found in citrus fruits and vegetable like broccoli and peppers. Vitamin E is found in seeds and nuts as well as soybeans and vegetable oils. Selenium is present in seafood, grains and Brazil nuts.

Hormones and Mood:
The brain likes the hormone Serotonin. It is the “happy hormone”. Serotonin is made from protein. If you do not get adequate protein in the diet, you will not get adequate serotonin. This is another reason to reduce simple carbohydrates and sugar and to increase protein and complex carbohydrates in the diet.

Heavy metals: Finally, heavy metal toxicity may play a role in mood and memory. There are many ways that we can become toxic to heavy metals. The most common one is from leakage from mercury fillings in our dental work. We also get heavy metal from some of the things we consume, such as Aluminum from canned products and cookware. It is best to avoid those things. Regular deodorant also contains aluminum, which should be avoided. Again, if you suspect this is a problem, find a physician who practices both traditional and non-traditional medicine and get checked out.

In summary, how food can affect your mood during the winter blahs:

- Eat breakfast, don’t skip meals.

- Eat fish and omega 3 fatty acids regularly (fish at least three times per week)

- Consume adequate protein every day, lowering simple carbohydrate intake such as sugar.

- Get rid of the chemically-laden junk foods!

- Do not become addicted to caffeine. Drink water too!

- Check hormones and supplement as needed.

- Add antioxidants to your diet, dark green leafy veggies, nuts, oils

- Add supplements per your natural medicine physician’s recommendations

In short, the way we eat can not only help us be more intelligent, alert and successful in mental activities, but also more balanced in our emotions and behavior, especially during the winter blah times. The way to build a foundation for a healthy mind/mood is with a healthy diet and supplementation.

Lifestyle factors: A lifestyle which includes ample relaxation time, meditation, proper exercise and plenty of sleep all help to regenerate and invigorate our mental state. Many physicians recommend light therapy as one part of their treatment for SAD patients or patients who are affected by lack of sunlight or winter dull-drums.

Here are some additional lifestyle recommendations to help get you through the winter:

- Get as much natural sunlight as possible, especially during the middle of the day. Open the blinds. Sit by a window to absorb sunlight while reading or during other indoor activities. Take a walk at lunch.

- Reduce stress. Avoid rushing and keep your schedules as simple as possible. Remember, less is more! Plan relaxation time into your day with music, quiet time or meditation. If you are having trouble in this department, see one of our doctors to help you with ways to reduce your stress.

- Make sure you get plenty of sleep. Poor sleep can really contribute to the blahs. If you are having trouble sleeping, you not only feel badly, but your body does not repair itself. Our doctors can help you regulate your sleep if needed.

- Exercise. Stay physically active throughout the winter months. Indoor activities can be useful stress relievers. Bundle up and run outside! That will get you going! Physical exercise can release hormones and neurochemicals that may help restore your body's natural balance.

- Bring live flowers or plants to your home or office.

- Enjoy a soak in a warm bath. Try Epsom salts if you have aches and pains.

- Take charge of your health and enhance your vitality and well-being. Renew your fitness goals.

- Pick up a new CD, one that makes you want to move around and dance. Crank up the volume and have some fun!

- Rent a crazy or fun movie to watch — something that will make you laugh.

- Get involved in your community. Whether volunteering for a homeless shelter or in your local school, there are many ways to reach out, and in turn, will help you feel better.

- Try a new recipe or food item. Be adventurous. Adding a little excitement to your kitchen may be just what you need. Try one of ours!

If you believe that you or someone you know may be suffering from the winter blahs or seasonal affective disorder, please give us a call. At Caring Medical, we find that often times, food, in addition to hormones and lack of specific nutrients, play a role in how you feel, particularly as it relates to SAD-type symptoms. Give us a call today at 708-848-7789!

PurpleIvy
PurpleIvy
joined 16 Mar 2005
855 posts

send a pm

Posted by PurpleIvy, 08:38 11 February 2008

That sounds like good advice for anyone, Linda, not just those with SAD.
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 10:14 11 February 2008

I agree, though some of the advice is tailored to people who have the symptoms of SAD. Low thyroid function, for example, can be a common contributor. I've seen some people on thyroid forums talking about how SAD was one of the symptoms that pointed them to what the underlying problem was. I wish I'd known to pursue various routes listed here, and maybe the 3 1/2 years of grinding depression I've experienced would have been shortened.
Me
joined 29 Oct 2007
422 posts

send a pm

Posted by Me, 18:50 28 February 2008

Linda
Visited your last recommended wensite (Caringnutrition). Came across the Hauser diet on it. Its really weird- it talks of acid and alkaline blood and has a questionnaire to take to discover which animal type you are. Im an otter apparently!

The strangest thing is that prior to looking at the website, I had already changed my diet to that similar to an otter even to the point of lots of exercise - aerobic and muscle building.

So this could be why I have lost so much weight and mostly feeling better.

With a final tweek this week (only tiny bit of fruit allowed per day and more protein). I am starting to get rid of that awful depression that sneeks on me from time to time. My sleep has reduced, I only had 5 hours last night and feeling good now! My constipation sorted and Im still working on my anxiety although it seems better.

So just got to keep an eye on my cholestrol now!!

Thanks Linda.

Me x
Linda
Linda
joined 15 Dec 2004
997 posts

send a pm

Posted by Linda, 07:56 29 February 2008

Wow, that's great news Me! It has to be said, I haven't heard of the Hauser diet. As long as it includes plenty of the things the body needs to be healthy then that's great.

Cholesterol -- again, high LDL is caused by problems with diet, usually too many processed foods, refined grains and sugars. But cholesterol can be a bit high without there being any dangers. Very low cholesterol is actually a huge health risk. You might be interested in this site http://www.thincs.org/index.htm It is mainly doctors who talk there:

The International network of Cholesterol Skeptics

"The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics (THINCS) is a steadily growing group of scientists, physicians, other academicians and science writers from various countries. Members of this group represent different views about the causation of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, some of them are in conflict with others, but this is a normal part of science. What we all oppose is that animal fat and high cholesterol play a role. The aim with this website is to inform our colleagues and the public that this idea is not supported by scientific evidence; in fact, for many years a huge number of scientific studies have directly contradicted it."

Cholesterol is vital for the body. A large percentage of the brain is made of cholesterol. It also helps repair the damage done by atherosclerosis. Researchers have found cholesterol at the scene of the crime, as it were, and arrested it as the culprit when it is really there to help.

It's been alarming to find out just how misinformed most doctors are, on a great number of issues. I'm going to avoid them as a hazard to my health unless they are the kind who would prescribe a vitamin or mineral.
James
James
joined 7 Jan 2008
39 posts

send a pm

Posted by James, 15:25 27 July 2008

A lot of depressed people have a very poor diet, due to a lot of reasons.

I stopped taking Rhodiola and now take a really good milti vitamin. Same price (90 for around £25) but I would highly recommend taking a milti vitamin to any depressed person.

I guess I can't post here about the brand but I think it's important that people know the difference between a good milti vitamin.
James
James
joined 7 Jan 2008
39 posts

send a pm

Posted by James, 15:26 27 July 2008

Here are the ingredients of the multi vit I take.

wo (2) tablets provide: Vitamin C (as Calcium Ascorbate)300mg Nutrient/Herbal Powder Base260mg (Providing Alfalfa, Rosehip Extract, Citrus Bioflavonoids, Rutin, Siberian Ginseng, Echinacea Purpurea Root, Suma Root, Spirulina, Lecithin, Dong Quai, Oat Fibre, Parsley,Watercress, Hesperidin Complex, Guar Gum) Isolated Soya Protein Powder200mg Vitamin E (200iu, as d-alpha tocopheryl succinate)134mg Calcium (as amino acid chelate+, carbonate)64mg Thiamin (Vitamin B1, as thiamine mononitrate)100mg Vitamin B6 (as pyridoxine hydrochloride)100mg Pantothenic Acid (as calcium pantothenate)100mg Riboflavin (Vitamin B2) 100mg Niacin (as niacinamide)100mg Inositol100mg Choline (as bitartrate) 41mg Natural Source Beta Carotene (as prep.)2400ug Providing other carotenoids13ug Magnesium (as oxide, buffered amino acid chelate+)32mg Iron (as bisglycinate++)10mg Boron (as sodium borate, citric acid)1mg Betaine HCl25mg Zinc (as oxide, amino acid chelate+)15mg Manganese (as gluconate, amino acid chelate+)2mg Soya Lecithin20mg Vitamin B12 (as cobalamin prep.) 100ug Copper (as gluconate, amino acid chelate+)1500ug Biotin (as prep.)100ug Vitamin D (400iu, as D2, ergocalciferol prep.)10ug L-Orthinine HCl 6mg Selenium (as selenomethionine)25ug L-Glutathione 5mg Taurine5mg Folic Acid (as prep.)400ug lodine (as potassium iodide prep.) 150ug Chromium (as picolinate, yeast free, nicotinoglycinate amino acid chelate+)25ug

+Special multi-chelate formula providing minerals complexed as amino acid chelates, citrates, aspartates, picolinates and highly absorbable mineral forms from Albion Process Patent #4,599,152 chelazomes. ++Unique form of chelated iron (iron bisglycinate)

Tableted with these natural ingredients: microcrystalline cellulose, stearic acid, silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate, cellulose gum, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, Vegetable Glycerin, Riboflavin.



There is a better milti vit than above.
Could someone please let me know if I'm allowed to post a link to the products?
Thrive Feel ALIVE
Thrive Feel ALIVE
joined 20 Nov 2008
5 posts

send a pm

Posted by Thrive Feel ALIVE, 15:44 21 November 2008

Linda you got it right!!

We have been lied to in our early programming and education.

Empower yourselves and start to learn about what makes your body function properly.

Mind, Body and the 3rd place are connected. One has an effect on the other.

Do not give up. There are Solutions to all or Our Problems.

You are what you eat.

All thought is Creative.

GoWithin or GoWithout.

You can Feel Happier and you can reprogram your brain!

Use Eastern and Western Medicine to create a combined medical system. Utilize the best of both worlds. Western medicine is focused on treating symptoms and Eastern more so focused on prevention. Both are important.

If you take medication use it as a TOOL to create new lifestyle habits. You can create good habits. 30 days is the general rule.

Most important.."One definition of INSANITY is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results".

You have to do some things differently to feel differently. Your good and bad habits need to be analyzed by you. Are they good for you ro bad. If bad figure out a plan to replace the bad habit and make change. 30 day plan1!!

You can do it.

Oh ya, reaserch how important Minerals are for EVERYTHING you feel and do. They are the starting point. Then vitmains etc.

Eat whole foods! The right oil is Really good for you. Stay away from red meat and chicken...huge hormones and other drugs which you ingest.

Keep fighting!


Peace
jasica
joined 5 May 2009
1 posts

send a pm

Posted by jasica, 07:34 5 May 2009

This link seemed pretty informative...

Bioflavonoids

Post a reply

Please note, this forum is for issues relating to SAD (Seasonal Affective Disorder) and light therapy.

The site is not monitored every day. Offensive posts, including those that blatantly promote products or services, will be removed but should you find something you dont like, please let us know.

To include working links in your post, use [url] at the start and [/url] at the end e.g. Have a look at [url]http://www.lumie.com[/url] for light therapy info

You can edit your message up to 15 minutes after posting.

Please send me an email when someone contributes to this discussion

Please note: submitting a comment will invite you to log in or register for free. Your comment will only display if you log in or register.

Forum terms and conditions.

Contact Us telephone 01954 780500